Re: Anyone seriously using 5.004?

2001-08-22 Thread Kurt D. Starsinic
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 09:11:41PM -0400, Michael Schwern wrote: > I've got 5.004_04, 5.004_05, 5.005_03, 5.6.1 and bleadperl installed > to test against. Should I bother with 5.004? Is anyone *seriously* > using it still? > > > PS When I say 5.004, I mean the original 5.004 release. If

Anyone seriously using 5.004?

2001-08-22 Thread Michael G Schwern
I've got 5.004_04, 5.004_05, 5.005_03, 5.6.1 and bleadperl installed to test against. Should I bother with 5.004? Is anyone *seriously* using it still? PS When I say 5.004, I mean the original 5.004 release. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl

Re: ANNOUNCE Test::Simple 0.14 WITH A TUTORIAL!

2001-08-22 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 10:45:35PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: > There's a potentially useful feature of Test.pm missing from Test::Simple > (and therefore Test::More) > The second argument of ok() is a "diagnostic" rather than a "name" > It's also allowed to be a code reference, which is run to

Pod::Tests backward compatibility Patch

2001-08-22 Thread Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
Title says it all :-) diff -ruP Pod-Tests-0.08.orig/bin/pod2test Pod-Tests-0.08/bin/pod2test --- Pod-Tests-0.08.orig/bin/pod2testThu Aug 23 06:41:45 2001 +++ Pod-Tests-0.08/bin/pod2test Thu Aug 23 06:38:48 2001 @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ $VERSION = '0.03'; use Pod::Tests; +use Symbol; =pod @@ -35

ANNOUNCE Test::Simple 0.14 WITH A TUTORIAL!

2001-08-22 Thread Michael G Schwern
Just uploaded Test::Simple 0.14. The big news is I've added in a first shot at a testing tutorial. It's pretty simple at the moment and missing a bunch of things, but I've gotten so many requests for some sort of tutorial that I didn't want to hold it back. So read Test::Tutorial. http://www.p