Re: Anyone seriously using 5.004?

2001-08-24 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 12:50:48PM +0200, Bart Lateur wrote: > >I've got 5.004_04, 5.004_05, 5.005_03, 5.6.1 and bleadperl installed > >to test against. Should I bother with 5.004? Is anyone *seriously* > >using it still? > > MacPerl, until 5.6.1 comes out of beta (it's still in alpha, now). An

Re: Anyone seriously using 5.004?

2001-08-24 Thread Bart Lateur
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:11:41 -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: >I've got 5.004_04, 5.004_05, 5.005_03, 5.6.1 and bleadperl installed >to test against. Should I bother with 5.004? Is anyone *seriously* >using it still? MacPerl, until 5.6.1 comes out of beta (it's still in alpha, now). And perhaps

Re: qa.perl.org

2001-08-24 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 01:24:47AM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > > Getting the word out about the various projects is something we > need, so I made > > http://qa.perl.org/ > > Schwern, I need some comments from you. :-) Ummm, perl-qa-metrics is a mailing list about developing code metri

qa.perl.org

2001-08-24 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
Getting the word out about the various projects is something we need, so I made http://qa.perl.org/ Schwern, I need some comments from you. :-) - ask -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();