As pleased as I was to announce 0.03, I'm now overjoyed to say that
I've just applied a patch from Dave Rolsky which improves the pod
scanning somewhat and takes us up to 0.04[0]
Richard - silly grin attached
[0] I was so stunned by getting a complete patch in 6 hours that I
fluffed generating a
I've cleaned up some of the docs, and added a new method in the form
of naked, which reveals what you've left uncovered. It's also now
possible to configure what you consider a private method to look like.
It's should be hitting your local CPAN mirror any time soon, or it's
available directly fr
The main improvement here is the introduction of a program, cover, to
generate reports. The most exciting report is a snazzy HTML one. Well,
more functional than snazzy actually. Anyone who wants to add snaz is
welcome to.
This can also function as an example for any other reports that people
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 10:27:15AM +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:18:07AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> > How would I keep it from complaining about undocumented,
> > internal-use-only helper functions?
>
> It currently allows any name starting with an underscore to be
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:18:07AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> How would I keep it from complaining about undocumented,
> internal-use-only helper functions?
It currently allows any name starting with an underscore to be
undocumented...
I'd assume that a future version would allow you to
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 03:02:16PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
>
> Caveats, this isn't heading to CPAN today at the testsuite is far from
> comprehensive, and I'd like some feedback before I release it. That
> and I was due to meet people at the pub an hour ago.
How would I keep it from complai
