Ooops, just realized I released that one without a date in the Changes
file. Oh well.
Just a couple of minor things. The most important one being that
pod2test will no longer produce any output if there's no embedded
tests.
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Inline-0.11.tar.gz
0.11 Thu
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:07:42PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> Attached is a script to test all modules in a dist,
Attachment error #1
> I think a "make
> pod-cover" and "make test-cover" would be cool, but I am not able to do such
> a beast.
Me also
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:17:57PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> Am I being goofy if I want to fix the stuff that I know is bad even if
> it can't be done via an ok() function? I seem to recall that the
> print "not " unless something;
> print "ok xx\n";
>
> occurs a lot and make VMS all urpy.
This gives a simpler implementation of ok() that also includes
descriptive names.
--- pod/perlhack.pod2001/08/28 13:54:34 1.1
+++ pod/perlhack.pod2001/08/30 21:00:31
@@ -1481,13 +1481,12 @@
my $test = 1;
sub ok {
-my($ok) = @_;
+my($ok, $name) = @_;
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:25:23PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> If I'm right, this is the format test, ain't it? If so, be
> *extremely* careful with the last part (60 lines or so), cause it
> depends on the way the IO handles are dealt with (nested write's)
Hmmm... you're messing with STDOUT.
On Thu 30 Aug 2001 20:46, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, quick run-through of what in t/op it's safe to use Test::More
> with. 'Yes' means use Test::More. 'No' means use an 'ok' function.
> 'No way' means you can't even use an 'ok' function.
>
> This is just a quick, cursory
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:18:31PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> >Hmmm. concat.t is wy too basic to use Test::More on it. delete.t
> >is pushing it. die.t and die_exit.t cannot be tested with Test::More
> >since it relies on that functionality.
> >
> Okay, not a problem. I can clean up the pr
Ok, quick run-through of what in t/op it's safe to use Test::More
with. 'Yes' means use Test::More. 'No' means use an 'ok' function.
'No way' means you can't even use an 'ok' function.
This is just a quick, cursory overview. Scream if something looks wrong.
t/op/64bitint.t Yes
t/op/an
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> I've switched over to using is() for anything that wasn't an '=='
> test' on funky numeric values; there are a lot of those in (e.g.)
> bop.t, and I didn't want to change the fundamental nature of the
> tests. I've also gotten my diff
