Re: A new lease on life for Perl Refactoring

2001-09-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:04:48AM -0400, Andrew M. Langmead wrote: So I'd think the best thing to do to make something that can produce answers to things like what are the implementors of foo. Yes, the two most important things are: Who are the implementors of methods/functions called

ANNOUNCE: Test::Mail 0.03

2001-09-16 Thread Kirrily Robert
Now winging its way towards CPAN mirrors worldwide. I've implemented it pretty much as described the other day. Comments etc welcome. K. -- Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/ Sure, only 2 percent of the Internet population uses lynx, but they're the top 2

Re: A new lease on life for Perl Refactoring

2001-09-16 Thread Andrew Wilson
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Michael G Schwern wrote: That's it. And the refactoring browser just helps you with the mechanics of that. THAT'S SO EASY! If it works for them, it can work for us. So, I can handle the underlying mechanics no problem. Who's good at GUIs?

A new lease on life for Perl Refactoring

2001-09-16 Thread Michael G Schwern
I'm at, of all places, the Scandinavian conference on Java And Object-Orientation (JAOO). Somebody stumbled upon the How To Be Lazy tutorial and thought I knew something about design methodologies. If nothing else it has the unique advantage of not being in New York. So who do I meet here but

Re: A new lease on life for Perl Refactoring

2001-09-16 Thread Andrew M. Langmead
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Michael G Schwern wrote: 1) Change this() to that() in both 'Foo' and 'Bar', and change all instances of $obj-this to $obj-that. 2) Walk through each call to $obj-this and decide if it should be changed to $obj-that.