On 2001.09.19 17:37 Paul Marquess wrote:
> Nope, it does both. The test files that start with digits are intended to
> test the features of the warnings pragma itself along with it's interaction
> with $^W. All the other files test specific warnings.
>
> The tests for warnings::enabled and warnin
In perl.qa, you wrote:
>Will do.
No! Read on! It's been done already.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
Any sufficiently fucked-up technology is indistinguishable from magic.
From: Rafael Garcia-Suarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Michael G Schwern listed:
> [...]
> > warnings::register (almost no docs)
Hmm, would a "see L and L." do?
> There are no tests for warnings.pm either.
>
> Note that there are two distinct points here :
>
> 1. test the warnings issued by th
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> So I had this bright idea. Test::FAQ and Test::Tutorial are just sort
> of sitting here on my hard drive not doing much of anything. Why not
> put them up as a Wiki and then everyone else can sort of just play
> around with it and we'll see what h
Michael G Schwern listed:
[...]
> warnings::register (almost no docs)
There are no tests for warnings.pm either.
Note that there are two distinct points here :
1. test the warnings issued by the perl interpreter; this is done by
lib/warnings.t, that calls the various files in t/lib/warnings/
