At 11:56 AM 11/7/2001 -1000, Tim Jenness wrote:
>> not ok 28 # POSIX::errno(): 20, $!: 0
>>
>> which I think means autoloading sets errno but isn't supposed to. I suspect
>> it's doing a -d somewhere and leaving an errno of ENOTDIR laying about. Hmm.
>>
>
>Well, $! is meant to be exactly er
'user1' looks like a volume logical name not a physical device name.
configure.com ought to have f$parse()ed out the physical device name.
Peter Prymmer
"Craig A
Do not bother trying to redefine the perlshr logical name. The only one
that
you need to redefine is PERL_ROOT since PERLSHR is defined in terms of
PERL_ROOT.
Try this:
$ @perl_setup
$ show default
$ show logical PERL_ROOT
$ define/trans=conc PERL_ROOT :[.]
Where you will need to deter
Type LOGOFF at the command prompt. You can lowercase commands and
abbreviate most
as well hence:
$ lo
will generally get you off. N.B. that "exit" will simply stop whatever
procedure or program that
you ^Y'ed out of. It won't get you off of the machine. "lo" will under
most circumstance
>From the command line:
$ show logical PERLSHR
as well as:
$ show logical PERL_ROOT
will be the (rough) equivalents of:
% echo $PATH
on Unix - at least as far as PERL is concerned. Craig's suggestion of
re-defining your PERL_ROOT to
point to your build directory is well worth following in
> - my $foo = $!;
> + my $foo = 0 + $!; # force numeric
> my $errno = POSIX::errno();
> print "not " unless $errno == $foo;
> - print "ok ", 28 + $test, " # POSIX::errno(): $errno, \$!: $!\n";
> + print "ok ", 28 + $test, " # POSIX::errno(): $errno, \$!:
At 09:53 PM 11/7/2001 +0100, Tels wrote:
>So, if I read Tim correctly, make that my $foo = $! + 0; and it might
>pass the test. Needs probably a bit more munging to print the $! in
>numeric context as well as $foo after a failure.
Thanks Tels and Tim. With the following additional change:
---
This patch adds a basic explanation of what testing bits can be used
in what tests.
Taking it's own advice, it modernizes the patch example to use
t/test.pl and is().
--- pod/perlhack.pod2001/11/07 20:32:08 1.1
+++ pod/perlhack.pod2001/11/07 20:50:18
@@ -1531,47 +1531,42 @@
Unicode
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote:
> I've made some progress getting this test to run (see working patch below)
> but I still get one failure:
>
> not ok 28 # POSIX::errno(): 20, $!: not a directory
>
> 20 is the correct value for ENOTDIR, but how can POSIX::errno() and $! be
> expecte
I've made some progress getting this test to run (see working patch below)
but I still get one failure:
not ok 28 # POSIX::errno(): 20, $!: not a directory
20 is the correct value for ENOTDIR, but how can POSIX::errno() and $! be
expected to be numerically equal when $! returns a string? Or i
10 matches
Mail list logo
