Re: [REPATCH MANIFEST, ext/re/re.t] Tests for re pragma

On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 04:16:48PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > Thanks to Benjamin Goldberg for finding a logic error in the previous version. > This also patches. Thanks, applied. Though I had to change the no_plan to a real one. -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this specia

Re: [PATCH MANIFEST, lib/ExtUtils/t/MM_OS2.t] Tests for ExtUtils::MM_OS2

On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 04:09:10PM -0700, chromatic wrote: > These tests all pass, though I don't have an OS2 box. I don't forsee any > difficulty there, though it would be good to check. > > -- c Thanks, applied. (.t in t/, though) -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this

[REPATCH MANIFEST, ext/re/re.t] Tests for re pragma

Thanks to Benjamin Goldberg for finding a logic error in the previous version. This also patches. Someone more familiar with regex tokens ought to make sure they're deparsed correctly. Never been a Nick, -- c --- ~MANIFEST Sat Dec 15 23:53:50 2001 +++ MANIFESTSat Dec 15 23:54:17 2001 @@

[PATCH MANIFEST, lib/ExtUtils/t/MM_OS2.t] Tests for ExtUtils::MM_OS2

These tests all pass, though I don't have an OS2 box. I don't forsee any difficulty there, though it would be good to check. -- c --- ~MANIFEST Thu Dec 20 16:06:11 2001 +++ MANIFESTThu Dec 20 16:06:26 2001 @@ -937,6 +937,7 @@ lib/ExtUtils/MM_Cygwin.pm MakeMaker methods for Cygwin l