Re: Compiled programs to keep BEGIN blocks? (was Re: [RFC] Switch to make Test::Builder output even if $^C ( for B::C ))

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 08:51:06AM +, Piers Cawley wrote: > > I don't understand. Why do we have to deal with them? Just translate > > the Perl code in the BEGIN block to C , dump it and make > > sure it gets run first. Right? > > > > I think I'm missing something very vital here. > > Let'

Re: Compiled programs to keep BEGIN blocks? (was Re: [RFC] Swit

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 15-Jan-02 Piers Cawley tried to scribble about: > Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [Snip a lot] > Let's see if I can come up with a simple counterexample that will show > up the problem. > > #!perl > my($compile_time, $start_time)

Re: Compiled programs to keep BEGIN blocks? (was Re: [RFC] Switchto make Test::Builder output even if $^C ( for B::C ))

Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 11:43:24PM +, Piers Cawley wrote: >> > What's left? >> >> What about begin blocks with side effects. How do you propose >> detecting the side effects. How do you deal with things that may >> dispatch to different subrout