Re: O_ACCMODE

2002-04-02 Thread Graham Barr
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:26:36AM -0500, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote: > > > You probably already found out, but > > > > HP-UX 10.20 Has it defined as 003 > > HP-UX 11.00 Has it defined as 003 > > AIX 4.3.3.0 Has it defined as 3 > > AIX 4.2.1.0 Has it defined as 3 > > Thanks for the inform

Re: O_ACCMODE

2002-04-02 Thread Mark-Jason Dominus
> You probably already found out, but > > HP-UX 10.20 Has it defined as 003 > HP-UX 11.00 Has it defined as 003 > AIX 4.3.3.0 Has it defined as 3 > AIX 4.2.1.0 Has it defined as 3 Thanks for the information. It turns out some Win32 systems don't have it at all, so I have to avo

Re: O_ACCMODE

2002-04-02 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Mon 01 Apr 2002 10:37, "H.Merijn Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon 01 Apr 2002 04:57, Mark-Jason Dominus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Supposing that Fcntl and O_RDONLY are known to be available, how > > likely is it that O_ACCMODE will also be available? Are there any > > platf