On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 08:28:26PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> >Now, the way I do this at the moment is have num_method_tests() walk up
> >the callstack until it finds a package that also isa Test::Class (in
> >this
> >case Base::Test) and then assume that is the class containing the method
> >
Oops... forgot to CC to group. Adrian.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun Jun 16, 2002 08:25:37 pm Europe/London
> To: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Test::Class... comments?
>
> On Sunday, June 16, 2002, at 09:07 am, Michael G
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 03:12:17AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> The Test::Harness::Straps part of 16938 has been defered until Pudge gets
> back to be with some more data. The patch only addresses the symptoms, the
> real problem is likely elsewhere.
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00224.html
P
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 12:14:59AM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> 0) Do other people find this vaguely sane? Even possibly useful?
Yes! xUnit with a Perl spin is something I've wanted for a long time.
> 1) Is Test::Class the right name?
If you ignore the "it doesn't say it's xUnit" problem,
