Re: Test::Builder-level

2002-11-13 Thread Adrian Howard
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 04:10 am, Michael G Schwern wrote: At YAPC::Europe there was some discussion about Test::Builder-level, $Test::Builder::Level and the fact that they don't really work well as implemented. I know we reached some sort of consensus about how to do it better, but

Re: Test::Builder-level

2002-11-13 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:21:38PM +, Adrian Howard wrote: At YAPC::Europe there was some discussion about Test::Builder-level, $Test::Builder::Level and the fact that they don't really work well as implemented. I know we reached some sort of consensus about how to do it better, but I've

Changing T::B behavior (was Re: And for the mod_perl folks... Test::Builder-reset)

2002-11-13 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:04:53PM +, Adrian Howard wrote: O! Just had an idea prompted by reset(). How about having $builder-push_state; $builder-pop_state; that would store and restore the complete state of the builder object in a stack? Would make it easier to