> Help me out here. I'm trying to imagine why someone would want
> WWW::Mechanize without a net connection. Or are you saying that people
> will want to use it strictly behind a restrictive firewall where
> google.com isn't accessible?
Yes.
-R
> There really aren't many tests that are meaningful without that access.
> 00.load.t, 99.pod and add_header.t are all that seem to be valid
> without it.
You could allow the user to choose between internal and external
tests, where the internal tests are much simpler, maybe including a
trivi
Alain Barbet writes:
>> Have you seen http://tinderbox.perl.org ? I've personally found that
>> useful for monitoring Parrot, though it's not obvious how well it would
>> scale for large numbers of smoke-test configurations.
>
>No I didn't know this, but find some good idea in this system too.
>I
>> And where did the p5p FAQ get to?
>MJD said he was taking it off his website... or do you mean the serious one?
Do you mean this?
http://simon-cozens.org/writings/p5p-faq
If someone wants to become a new champion for it, we can keep it on
http://dev.perl.org/perl5. (Another way to enable th
