Re: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-06 Thread Tels
e everything works. > > Help me out here. I'm trying to imagine why someone would want > WWW::Mechanize without a net connection. Or are you saying that people > will want to use it strictly behind a restrictive firewall where > google.com isn't accessible? Yes. Cheers,

RE: WWW::Mechanize 0.37 released

2003-03-05 Thread Tels
fix stability issues on > Windows. Damn. I still forgot to check out this incredible cool sounding module, I have some HTML-output testing in a testsuite and it is very whacky and uncomplete... Thanx again for your work, Tels - -- Signed on Wed Mar 5 17:52:44 2003 with http://bloodgate.co

Re: Test::Builder->level

2002-11-11 Thread Tels
decided there too. This just sounds like the AMoAAP (Annual meeting of Anonymous Alzheimer Patients) :-) > Was it something like, "You should be able to say, 'Everything from > package Foo should have a default level of 2'?" Yep, definitely AMoAAP...probably half of them wasn

RE: [ANNOUNCE] tv (Test::Verbose 0.001)

2002-10-24 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 24-Oct-02 Barrie Slaymaker carved into stone: > New! Improved! As Seen On TV!! > > ahem. > > tv is a command bundled with Test::Verbose that puts an easier, smarter > interface around the ExtUtils testing system. > > Aside from easing debugging acces

Re: Test::Class - comments wanted

2002-10-14 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 14-Oct-02 Michael G Schwern carved into stone: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 04:01:10PM -0700, David Wheeler wrote: > The explicit plan protects against: > > 1. Your test dying. > 2. Your test not printing tests to STDOUT > 3. Exiting early via exit(). 4

Re: [ Memory ] Re: Thought

2002-10-11 Thread Tels
en hack, but a neat interface. >> >> Very open to additions. >> >> Useful? >> >> Feedback please > > Thank you Dan! > > Devel::Size from Dan Sugalski is what we all want, don't we? YES! Juhu! Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Boll

Re: [ Memory ] Re: Thought

2002-10-05 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 05-Oct-02 Slaven Rezic carved into stone: > Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> But shouldn't that be just the same, or slightly more (if the memory is >> used in chunks of, let's say 16 bytes, it might alloc up to 15

Re: [ Memory ] Re: Thought

2002-10-05 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 05-Oct-02 Slaven Rezic carved into stone: > Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> >> Moin, >> >> On 05-Oct-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] carved into stone: >> > En

Re: [ Memory ] Re: Thought

2002-10-05 Thread Tels
# baseline require Math::BigInt; Math::BigInt->import(); report(); # and now? So you get it in one go (assuming the (nonyetexistant?) Proc::Memory is lightwight :) Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -le'print Dev::Bollocks->rand()'

RE: Smoke db (was perl-current doesn't compil on MinGw-2.0.0-3)

2002-10-03 Thread Tels
for now :-( > Regards, I can put it up, but there is limited time to update the cgi-scripts (you need to mail them to me and I need to put them up). So if the code is stable, I can donate the page and the bandwidth (up to a limit, though). Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -le'pri

Re: [ Memory ] Re: Thought

2002-10-02 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 02-Oct-02 Nicholas Clark carved into stone: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 05:06:53PM +0200, Tels wrote: > >> On 02-Oct-02 H.Merijn Brand carved into stone: > > Going to be a bit hard to change, then :-) :-) >> > As a start

RE: [ Memory ] Re: Thought

2002-10-02 Thread Tels
MemUsed sounds much better (although I displike CamelHumpSpelling but that's just me :) How about just calling it "memory"? Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -le'print Dev::Bollocks->rand()' elementarily drive advanced technologies http://bloodgate.com/per

Re: Web Site Testing

2002-09-23 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 23-Sep-02 Andy Lester carved into stone: >> 4) WWW::Automate and WWW::Chat > > I've forked WWW::Automate as WWW::Mechanize, to make it a bit more > robust, and to fix the bugs that have gone unfixed for at least six > months. > > Also, I don't see an

Re: Devel::Cover and v5.8.0

2002-09-05 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 05-Sep-02 Paul Johnson carved into stone: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:25:30PM +0200, Tels wrote: > >> null:/home/te/perl/perl-5.8.0/lib # perl -MDevel::Cover -I. >> Math/Complex.t >> [snip] >> Can't locate o

Re: Devel::Cover and v5.8.0 [PATCH]

2002-09-04 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 04-Sep-02 Rafael Garcia-Suarez carved into stone: > Tels wrote in perl.qa : >> --- Cover.pm.old Wed Sep 4 23:36:14 2002 >> +++ Cover.pm Wed Sep 4 23:38:46 2002 >> @@ -144,6 +144,8 @@ sub report >>

RE: Devel::Cover and v5.8.0 [PATCH]

2002-09-04 Thread Tels
ized value in multiplication (*) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i686-linux/Devel/Cover/Criterion.pm line 32. when trying to run for instance 5.8.0-Complex.t trough it. Hm. Tomorrow is another day... HTH, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks->rand(),"\n

Devel::Cover and v5.8.0

2002-09-04 Thread Tels
ailed--call queue aborted. B.pm contains B::SPECIAL in only one place and no "START" AFAIS. Devel::Cover seems to die always with this error. Did anybody use Devel::Cover with 5.8.0 yet? Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("2159601568698

Re: Thought

2002-08-30 Thread Tels
p to see how much memory it uses. The idea is great! Can I have it? I won't mind: use statistics qw/memory_usage/; use Foo; my $a = Foo->new(); print memory_usage($a),"\n"; print statistics::live_time($a),"\n"; or whatever. Than

Re: RFC: Test::ManyParams

2002-08-03 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 02-Aug-02 Janek Schleicher carved into stone: > Tels wrote at Sat, 03 Aug 2002 00:25:54 +0200: > That reads really good, > especially when written as > Test::ManyParams seed => undef; >:-) :-) >> seed or randomized are both

Re: RFC: Test::ManyParams

2002-08-02 Thread Tels
d 2 should do the same and just do a seed = srand(rand()). (I did not quite understand your srand(0) or srand(42) example...what is that supposed to accomplish?) Best wishes, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks->rand(),"\n"' conveniently build

Re: RFC: Test::ManyParams

2002-08-02 Thread Tels
? ;) So it is even better ;) > This is the problem that I have, and I think I've found a solution that > works for me. I also do this in Math::BigInt's testsuite (suggestion by Paul Green) and it is really nice; systematic tests almost always fail to address the more strange cornercases

Re: Test::MockObject 0.03

2002-04-28 Thread Tels
ode like: Actually, I have a big project, which uses a lot of "inline" mock interfaces so that I can test a class without having to "use" all the "parent" classes/packages. I think that with Test::Mock I could shorten my testscripts. Having several pages of inline moc

Re: [ID 20020318.003] cannot open STDOUT into in memory variable

2002-03-20 Thread Tels
he core in the area thinks it should work, > but > it doesn't) > > 2: (For the perl-qa people) Is there a workable solution yet to making >a tool to auto-test all the code examples in the pod? I hacked once something together, but it stumbled on some silly t

RE: Maintaining Archive::Tar and Archive::Zip

2002-03-02 Thread Tels
while the original author is still in effect. Hope that helps, Tels On 02-Mar-02 Adrian Phillips tried to scribble about: > > On the Amavis mailing list (www.amavis.org) it has been mentioned > several times that Archive::Tar and Archive::Zip are unmaintained, the > current amavis aut

Re: make cover

2002-03-01 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 28-Feb-02 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:23:43PM +0100, Tels wrote: > >> Anyway, it is not so easy to run your entire testsuite trough >> Devel::Cover. Well, sort it is: >> >> PERL_DL

make cover

2002-02-28 Thread Tels
ke: perl Makefile.PL make cover make podcover The former does anything, the latter only pod coverage. That way it would be easier for module authors to do testsuite coverage. The make target could also then print a summary. Currently you have then to do this manually. What

RE: ANNOUNCE: Pod::Coverage 0.10

2002-02-18 Thread Tels
iated. Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks->rand(),"\n"' continuously extend second-generation data http://bloodgate.com/perl My current Perl projects PGP key available on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or via email -BEGIN PGP SIGN

Re: Compiled programs to keep BEGIN blocks? (was Re: [RFC] Swit

2002-01-15 Thread Tels
t; The only thing that can make that distinction is a human being. The And how does the interpreter do this? Certainly not by prompting the user: Run BEGIN blocks (y/n)? [y] Just a silly question...;o) Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks->rand(),"

Re: is() with arbitrary comparisions

2001-12-19 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 11-Dec-01 Kirrily Robert tried to scribble about: > In perl.qa, you wrote: >>I think I have a solution to the rigidity of is(). ie. something with >>the diagnostic output of is(), but the flexibility of ok(). > >>It all makes sense, so what I really n

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple/More/Builder/Tutorial 0.40

2001-12-17 Thread Tels
does some looping or simple prints "ok $test\n"; Please make can_ok() increase the testcount by the number of methods. Thanx in advance! Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks->rand(),"\n"' heterogeneously establish 24/7 methodologies http://blood

test counts

2001-12-16 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [I sent thi sofflist to Schwern, but since everybody likes to chat about their modules' testcount, I'll resend it ;] Moin, On 15-Dec-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 11:48:29PM +0100, Tels wrote: >> T

Re: Untested modules update: There's more than we thought

2001-12-15 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 15-Dec-01 Jarkko Hietaniemi tried to scribble about: >> Ok, so that's a bit off the topic of "why use isa_ok()" but I just don't >> see why people seem to object to the use of Test::More in the core Perl >> tests. I can't see how it couldn't help impr

Re: is(), undef, '' and 0 (was Re: [PATCH lib/DB.pm MANIFEST lib

2001-11-24 Thread Tels
' => '' on stringify is ($x, undef); # doesn't fail as it should > If I mean '' and undef to be equivalently correct, I usually want to > express that explicitly. Like: is ($x || '', ''); Cheer

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-20 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 20-Nov-01 Bart Lateur tried to scribble about: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:36:45 +0100 (CET), Tels wrote: > >>> sub canonpath { >>> return File::Spec->canonpath($_[1]); >>> } >> >>I

RE: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-20 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 19-Nov-01 Dave Rolsky tried to scribble about: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Tels wrote: > Yes, this should be using File::Spec (unless the code in ExtUtils for > doing these differs in a way that needs to be preserved). I know there > are some

Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 19-Nov-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:11:51PM +0100, Tels wrote: >> oh, related to: >> >> http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2001-11/msg01172.h >> tml >>

RE: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, oh, related to: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2001-11/msg01172.html ? On 19-Nov-01 Tels tried to scribble about: [snip] > * There are a couple of functions I have tests for, BUT: > > =item canonpath >

RE: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0

2001-11-19 Thread Tels
7;ll > have to get a job. Oh, it seems so easy to get rid of my job, I just need to propose to pay some money for some unlikely event and *pouff* ;) Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks->rand(),"\n"' vitalistically monetize transparent

RE: ext/POSIX/t/posix.t on VMS

2001-11-08 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 08-Nov-01 Craig A. Berry tried to scribble about: > At 7:39 PM -1000 11/7/01, Tim Jenness wrote: >>On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote: [snip] > Well, here's that complete test before my modifications: > { > for my $test (0, 1) { > $!

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > I keep getting hit by things that think I am running Micros~1 stuff :-( Those worms, again. *sigh* > Looks like you have it now, but let me know if that's not the case. Since I am constantly developi

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Tels wrote: > >> Thank you for your work! I looked at BigFloat.pm, noticed a untested >> line >> in facmp(), added tests and lo and

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > I ran this last night, and supply the results here without comment save: Thank you for your work! I looked at BigFloat.pm, noticed a untested line in facmp(), added tests and lo and behold, there was

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
rested in why some test files have poor coverage ;) I tried to view my modules, but your server is currently melting and can't deliver the HUGE html documents :/ Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("215960156869840440586892398248"),"\n&qu

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-03 Thread Tels
t a bit to: Files=1, Tests=27, Seconds=7 (5.93 usr + 1.15 sys = 7.08 CPU) or even removing the wallclock seconds (Time/CPU are both ok): Files=1, Tests=27, Time=7.08s (5.93 usr + 1.15 sys) At least the space after the "(" should go. Just nitpicking ;) Cheers,

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-03 Thread Tels
r of tests/files, too! I need that absolutely, since Calc does now different numbers of tests for different platforms/configurations. Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("215960156869840440586892398248"),"\n"' http://bloo

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 02-Oct-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Tels wrote: >> Me. It doesn't hurt, > Well, it does. It's more junk that obscures the true purpose, which How actually? For h

Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber

2001-10-02 Thread Tels
everytime you need it sounds like pain. Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("215960156869840440586892398248"),"\n"' http://bloodgate.com/thief/ Thief - The Dark Project http://bloodgate.com/perl My current P

RE: Essential Modules

2001-09-29 Thread Tels
ut I was too lazy to try). Oh, and is it possible to send the changes PGP signed? Silly question, I know Thanx! Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("215960156869840440586892398248"),"\n"' http://bloodgate.com/thief/ Thief

RE: Compaq Testdrive

2001-09-23 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 23-Sep-01 Tels tried to scribble about: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Just wait until the script kiddies detect this - your faith in humanity > is > great... There is a ";)" missingsorry ;o) - -- perl -MMath::S

RE: Compaq Testdrive

2001-09-23 Thread Tels
::Calc! Yeah! Oh: http://magnonel.guild.net/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?CompaqTestDrive Just wait until the script kiddies detect this - your faith in humanity is great... Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("215960156869840440586892398248&q

Re: Untested libraries update

2001-09-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Sep-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:57:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> How about testing on 127.0.0.1? > > As insane as it sounds, it might not be there. There might be no IP > system at all. Con

RE: Wiki Wiki Working

2001-09-18 Thread Tels
d be so kind as to fill in TestTutorial from the latest > version of Test::Tutorial? Somebody beat me to it. Cheers, Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("215960156869840440586892398248"),"\n"' http://bloodgate.com/thief/

Re: ANNOUNCE: Pod::Coverage 0.06 (with discourse Re: ANNOUNCE: P

2001-09-05 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 04-Sep-01 Richard Clamp tried to scribble about: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 04:24:51PM +0200, Tels wrote: >> attached is a revised version of pod_cover.pl which you can use to test >> a whole distribution using the new v0.06 API. >

RE: ANNOUNCE: Pod::Coverage 0.06 (with discourse Re: ANNOUNCE: P

2001-09-02 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, oups, round 2. Stupid, I should have tested it better before: Have fun, Tels - -- perl -MMath::String -e 'print \ Math::String->from_number("215960156869840440586892398248"),"\n"' http://bloodgate.com/thief/

RE: ANNOUNCE: Pod::Coverage 0.06 (with discourse Re: ANNOUNCE: P

2001-09-02 Thread Tels
neither exist from the authors nor the users point of view. Otherwise it looks good ;o) And really, the idea for Pod::Coverage is so obvious, as all great ideas are ;) Cheers, Tels PS: I see that Math::BigInt has a pood pod coverage. Well, I always (wrongly?) assumed having code-examples counts

RE: [PATCH] rm t/run/segfault.t; mv t/op/misc.t t/run/kill_perl.

2001-09-02 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 02-Sep-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > Okay, part two of the t/op/misc.t cleanup. This one deletes > t/run/segfault.t (redundant) and moves t/op/misc.t to the more > descriptive t/run/kill_perl.t > > --- MANIFEST 2001/09/02 00:13:36