on
Windows.
Damn. I still forgot to check out this incredible cool sounding module, I
have some HTML-output testing in a testsuite and it is very whacky and
uncomplete...
Thanx again for your work,
Tels
- --
Signed on Wed Mar 5 17:52:44 2003 with http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc
perl -MDev
Patients) :-)
Was it something like, You should be able to say, 'Everything from
package Foo should have a default level of 2'?
Yep, definitely AMoAAP...probably half of them wasn't even there, because
they forgot to attend...
Cheers,
Tels
SCNR;)
- --
perl -MDev::Bollocks -le'print Dev::Bollocks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 24-Oct-02 Barrie Slaymaker carved into stone:
New! Improved! As Seen On TV!!
ahem.
tv is a command bundled with Test::Verbose that puts an easier, smarter
interface around the ExtUtils testing system.
Aside from easing debugging access (see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 05-Oct-02 Slaven Rezic carved into stone:
Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 05-Oct-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] carved into stone:
En op 5 oktober 2002 sprak Ann Barcomb:
I hadn't looked in to how I could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 05-Oct-02 Slaven Rezic carved into stone:
Tels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But shouldn't that be just the same, or slightly more (if the memory is
used in chunks of, let's say 16 bytes, it might alloc up to 15 more).?
The malloc system
-scripts (you
need to mail them to me and I need to put them up). So if the code is
stable, I can donate the page and the bandwidth (up to a limit, though).
Cheers,
Tels
- --
perl -MDev::Bollocks -le'print Dev::Bollocks-rand()'
collaboratively initiate leading-edge partnerships
http
,
sbrk () - $end, bytes\n;
# Easier
use Devel::Internals;
my array = (1..1);
MemUsed creation of array;
MemUsed sounds much better (although I displike CamelHumpSpelling but
that's just me :)
How about just calling it memory?
Cheers,
Tels
contains B::SPECIAL in only one place and no START AFAIS.
Devel::Cover seems to die always with this error.
Did anybody use Devel::Cover with 5.8.0 yet?
Cheers,
Tels
- --
perl -MMath::String -e 'print \
Math::String-from_number(215960156869840440586892398248),\n'
http://bloodgate.com/perl
line 32.
when trying to run for instance 5.8.0-Complex.t trough it. Hm. Tomorrow is
another day...
HTH,
Tels
- --
perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks-rand(),\n'
proactively maintain essential e-tailers
http://bloodgate.com/perl My current Perl projects
PGP key available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 02-Aug-02 Janek Schleicher carved into stone:
Tels wrote at Sat, 03 Aug 2002 00:25:54 +0200:
That reads really good,
especially when written as
Test::ManyParams seed = undef;
:-)
:-)
seed or randomized are both good, I like the shorter one
finds these obscure bugs, especially when your code
done by the tests is non-trivial.
Cheers,
Tels
- --
perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks-rand(),\n'
conveniently revolutionize one-to-one action-items
http://bloodgate.com/perl My current Perl projects
PGP key available on http
in
effect.
Hope that helps,
Tels
On 02-Mar-02 Adrian Phillips tried to scribble about:
On the Amavis mailing list (www.amavis.org) it has been mentioned
several times that Archive::Tar and Archive::Zip are unmaintained, the
current amavis author has tried to send patches for both packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 28-Feb-02 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 07:23:43PM +0100, Tels wrote:
Anyway, it is not so easy to run your entire testsuite trough
Devel::Cover. Well, sort it is:
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/perl -Iblib
make cover
make podcover
The former does anything, the latter only pod coverage. That way it would
be easier for module authors to do testsuite coverage. The make target
could also then print a summary. Currently you have then to do this
manually.
What do you think?
Cheers,
Tels
PS
the user:
Run BEGIN blocks (y/n)? [y]
Just a silly question...;o)
Cheers,
Tels
- --
perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks-rand(),\n'
vitalistically unleash guinine experiences
http://bloodgate.com/perl My current Perl projects
PGP key available on http://bloodgate.com
prints ok $test\n;
Please make can_ok() increase the testcount by the number of methods.
Thanx in advance!
Tels
- --
perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks-rand(),\n'
heterogeneously establish 24/7 methodologies
http://bloodgate.com/perl My current Perl projects
PGP key available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
[I sent thi sofflist to Schwern, but since everybody likes to chat about
their modules' testcount, I'll resend it ;]
Moin,
On 15-Dec-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 11:48:29PM +0100, Tels wrote:
TeOne day Math::Big
need to propose to pay
some money for some unlikely event and *pouff* ;)
Cheers,
Tels
- --
perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks-rand(),\n'
vitalistically monetize transparent e-services
http://bloodgate.com/perl My current Perl projects
PGP key available on http://bloodgate.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
oh, related to:
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2001-11/msg01172.html
?
On 19-Nov-01 Tels tried to scribble about:
[snip]
* There are a couple of functions I have tests for, BUT:
=item canonpath
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 08-Nov-01 Craig A. Berry tried to scribble about:
At 7:39 PM -1000 11/7/01, Tim Jenness wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Craig A. Berry wrote:
[snip]
Well, here's that complete test before my modifications:
{
for my $test (0, 1) {
$! = 0;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about:
I keep getting hit by things that think I am running Micros~1 stuff :-(
Those worms, again. *sigh*
Looks like you have it now, but let me know if that's not the case.
Since I am constantly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about:
I ran this last night, and supply the results here without comment save:
Thank you for your work! I looked at BigFloat.pm, noticed a untested line
in facmp(), added tests and lo and behold, there was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On 21-Sep-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 10:57:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about testing on 127.0.0.1?
As insane as it sounds, it might not be there. There might be no IP
system at all. Consider
neither
exist from the authors nor the users point of view.
Otherwise it looks good ;o)
And really, the idea for Pod::Coverage is so obvious, as all great ideas
are ;)
Cheers,
Tels
PS: I see that Math::BigInt has a pood pod coverage. Well, I always
(wrongly?) assumed having code-examples counts
24 matches
Mail list logo
