On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:25:08PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> Here's a patch to Test::Tutorial that improves the test names along those
> criteria. It may be worth adding a few lines on good test names.
>
> Maybe it's worth discussing good testing style, too.
Maybe it's worth editing on the Wiki
Our fearless pumpking recently weighed in on test names that assume success.
What he said made a lot of sense. If a test fails, the message looks all
wrong.
That may compel some people to fix the tests or the modules, but it may confuse
more people.
Here's a patch to Test::Tutorial that improve
