Re: Binary-wise is()

2002-12-10 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Mark Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd like to have a custom version of is(), say binary_is(), that > > > reports 'strings 1 and 2 differ at byte 635, got 0x92, expected 0x42' > > > or 'strings 1 differ in length, got 3874, expected 3875'. > > Oooh, that would be really helpful. I often

Re: Binary-wise is()

2002-11-28 Thread Tony Bowden
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:35:33PM +, Mark Fowler wrote: > See also Acme::Test::Buffy (lame example testing module), and > Test::Builder::Tester for help testing Test::Binary. We found that for testing Test::Builder objects, it was handy to do things like: *orig_ok = \&Test::Builder::ok;

Re: Binary-wise is()

2002-11-27 Thread Mark Fowler
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > > I'd like to have a custom version of is(), say binary_is(), that > > reports 'strings 1 and 2 differ at byte 635, got 0x92, expected 0x42' > > or 'strings 1 differ in length, got 3874, expected 3875'. Oooh, that would be

Re: Binary-wise is()

2002-11-27 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > I'd like to have a custom version of is(), say binary_is(), that > reports 'strings 1 and 2 differ at byte 635, got 0x92, expected 0x42' > or 'strings 1 differ in length, got 3874, expected 3875'. > > Is there already some modu

Binary-wise is()

2002-11-27 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Hi, here's an easy question for you Test:: experts : I write lots of test those days with is() comparing binary strings (mainly produced by combination of pack() and other algorithms.) The problem is that the output message of is() when those tests fail is not very helpful. I'd like to have a cus