Re: Graphically depicting coverage vs. test results

2002-12-17 Thread Adrian Howard
Ah. Confusion of vocab. You're talking about the order of the test scripts rather than the order of tests run by those scripts. Yes? I think Tony was talking about the order of tests. While key test scripts tend to be run earlier in some setups, I'm not sure that's it going to be a useful

Re: Graphically depicting coverage vs. test results

2002-12-17 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:35:38AM +, Adrian Howard wrote: Ah. Confusion of vocab. You're talking about the order of the test scripts rather than the order of tests run by those scripts. Yes? Ah, Yes. I think Tony was talking about the order of tests. OK. I think I'm hampered by never

Graphically depicting coverage vs. test results

2002-12-10 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
Here's an interesting way of depicting the statements that are likely to have cause test failures: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/aristotle/Tools/tarantula/ Tarantula displays each source code statement using color models that reflect its relative success rate of its execution by the test