On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I'd encourage you to write a Test::Builder based module that does more
> complete set & complex data testing. Either talk to Barrie about
> adding it to Test::Differences or start a new module. Test::Set,
> Test::Data::Deep, etc...
But but I've al
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 12:01:45PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
> Firstly, is there anyway we could get Test::Builder's diag (and thus
> Test::More's) diag to return false not true like it currently does.
>
> This would then allow me to write simply
>
> sub is_reversed
> {
> return $Tester->ok($
Firstly, is there anyway we could get Test::Builder's diag (and thus
Test::More's) diag to return false not true like it currently does.
This would then allow me to write simply
sub is_reversed
{
return $Tester->ok($_[0] eq reverse($_[1]))
or $Tester->diag("The reverse of '$_[0]' is '".rev
