On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:04:48AM -0400, Andrew M. Langmead wrote:
> So I'd think the best thing to do to make something that can produce
> answers to things like "what are the implementors of foo".
Yes, the two most important things are:
Who are the implementors of methods/functions called
Now winging its way towards CPAN mirrors worldwide.
I've implemented it pretty much as described the other day.
Comments etc welcome.
K.
--
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://infotrope.net/
"Sure, only 2 percent of the Internet population uses lynx, but they're
the top 2 perc
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> That's it. And the refactoring browser just helps you with the
> mechanics of that.
>
> THAT'S SO EASY! If it works for them, it can work for us.
>
>
> So, I can handle the underlying mechanics no problem. Who's good at
> G
I'm at, of all places, the Scandinavian conference on Java And
Object-Orientation (JAOO). Somebody stumbled upon the How To Be Lazy
tutorial and thought I knew something about design methodologies.
If nothing else it has the unique advantage of not being in New York.
So who do I meet here but Ma
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 10:45:50AM +0200, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> 1) Change this() to that() in both 'Foo' and 'Bar', and change all
> instances of $obj->this to $obj->that.
>
> 2) Walk through each call to $obj->this and decide if it should
> be changed to $obj->that
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Andrew M. Langmead"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'd think the best thing to do to make something that can produce answers
> to things like "what are the implementors of foo".
Ideally, there'd also be a comprehensive test suite to run after the
refactoring to
