Fw: CPAN Upload: H/HM/HMBRAND/Test-Smoke-1.08.tgz

2001-09-18 Thread H . Merijn Brand
Open for evaluation. *** Release 1.08 Tue 18 Sep 2001, Merijn - MANIFEST check - missed harness tests (Nick) - Added changes for MSVC5 / dmake (Mattia) - Several README changes - Auto sensing mailer (mailx, sendmail, mail) in that order from

RE: Wiki Wiki Working

2001-09-18 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 18-Sep-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: > Got the Wiki working, it seems Opera is at fault, being unable to > handle anything more than 10K in a POST. Unfortunately, I don't seem > to have anything else servicable. > > http://www.pobox.c

Parrot testing going ok?

2001-09-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
I just subscribed to perl6-internals yesterday, so I'm trying to catch up. What's going on with the Parrot tests? It looks like everything's well in hand without me. I have trained you well. :) I'll just stand over here and look happy. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://

Re: Parrot testing going ok?

2001-09-18 Thread Simon Cozens
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 07:02:58PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > I just subscribed to perl6-internals yesterday, so I'm trying to catch > up. What's going on with the Parrot tests? It looks like > everything's well in hand without me. I have trained you well. :) Cool, huh? % make test pe

Untested libraries update

2001-09-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
Here's where we're at. I might be a little off on the Pod:: tests. chromatic and Andrew Wilson took a good chunk out of it. CGI is now pretty well covered. More of ExtUtils are tested, and rather amazingly, Term::Complete! For Term::ReadLine you may be able to steal/draw inspiration from the

Re: Wiki Wiki Working

2001-09-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Tels wrote: > They are up in POD, not HTML. Shouldn't that be changed? Ummm, that's kinda hard to do. Wikis aren't really designed to do POD translation. I'm using the UseModWiki, if anyone's familiar with it and can figure out a way for it to run selec

Parrot::Test need special support in Test::Simple

2001-09-18 Thread Mattia Barbon
Currently P::T provides three functions: output_is/isnt/like, which are wrappers to Test::More::is/isnt/like. The failure output is: t/op/integerok 24/26# Failed test (Parrot/Test.pm at line 73) it would be nice: t/op/integerok 24/26# Failed test (t/op/integer.t line xyz) To do

Re: Parrot::Test need special support in Test::Simple

2001-09-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:38:45AM +0200, Mattia Barbon wrote: > Currently P::T provides three functions: > output_is/isnt/like, which are wrappers to > Test::More::is/isnt/like. > > The failure output is: > t/op/integerok 24/26# Failed test (Parrot/Test.pm at line 73) > > it would be ni

[ANNOUNCE] Test::Simple 0.19

2001-09-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.19.tar.gz The important thing here is that Test::Simple/More will no longer send diagnostics to STDERR, they will got to STDOUT. This is mostly to make TODO tests quiet, but it also means tests which fail under Test::Harness will also be quiet (ie.

Re: Parrot::Test need special support in Test::Simple

2001-09-18 Thread chromatic
In article <20010918185441.J585@blackrider>, "Michael G Schwern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's on my TODO list to decouple the guts of Test::Simple from the external > functions, so it's easier to write Test modules based on it, but it's about > two or three levels down on the list. What mig

Re: Parrot::Test need special support in Test::Simple

2001-09-18 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:26:03PM -0600, chromatic wrote: > In article <20010918185441.J585@blackrider>, "Michael G Schwern" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's on my TODO list to decouple the guts of Test::Simple from the external > > functions, so it's easier to write Test modules based on