From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:39:50AM +0100, Paul Marquess wrote:
> > The subject says Compress::Zlib, but the body doesn't. Which is
> the typo?
>
> The subject. I'd thrown it into the list, I remember there having
> been some trouble with it
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 09:12:01PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > use Test::More tests => 10; # or whatever.
>
> Except this needs to printed just once in the parent _before_ any tests
> are run.
Why not just do it before you do any forking?
Could I see a copy of the idealized representatio
This adds several tests for Term::Cap. It *should* be portable, as it's pretty
cautious about avoiding platform dependencies. Time always tells.
Looking at Term::Cap itself, there are some formats mentioned in comments at
the start of Tgoto() that aren't implemented. They look pretty obscure.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 04:10:02PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> This adds several tests for Term::Cap. It *should* be portable, as it's pretty
> cautious about avoiding platform dependencies. Time always tells.
Thanks, applied. And immediately edited: trusting on particular
external error message
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 09:12:01PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > > use Test::More tests => 10; # or whatever.
> >
> > Except this needs to printed just once in the parent _before_ any tests
> > are run.
>
> Why not just do it before you do any
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 05:06:28PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > Why not just do it before you do any forking?
>
> I could, but then Test::Builder gets confused cause the tests run via
> system don't change the internal variables Test::Builder uses.
>
> > Could I see a copy of the idealized repr
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> OH! I thought you were literally using fork(), not running another
> program. Now that makes a little more sense.
Yeah, I realized I should've been clearer after a few exchanges (I'm
slow).
> I suppose the idea here is something like:
>
> sy
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 08:06:42PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> Something like that. So I know what order the tests are in. I know how
> many should be run each time. But when the 'some_test' code runs, it
> shouldn't print a header (cause its in the middle of a larger batch) and
> the analysis
