Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Tels wrote: > >> Thank you for your work! I looked at BigFloat.pm, noticed a untested >> line >> in facmp(), added tests and lo and behold, there was a bug! >>

[PROPOSED PATCH MANIFEST lib/Net/Netrc.t] Add Tests for Net::Netrc

2001-10-21 Thread chromatic
[not yet sent to p5p; comments welcome] Is this valuable for anyone? I could probably turn something like this into an article for perl.com or the Perl Journal or even use.perl, if anyone could sweet-talk an editor or thinks gonzo testing ought to be promoted. Schwern thinks it's clever, so it

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 07:31:20PM +0200, Tels wrote: > On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:42:33PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:07:26AM -0600, chromatic wrote: > >> > > - Of those covered, a smidge less than half hav

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > I keep getting hit by things that think I am running Micros~1 stuff :-( Those worms, again. *sigh* > Looks like you have it now, but let me know if that's not the case. Since I am constantly developi

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:42:33PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:07:26AM -0600, chromatic wrote: > > > - Of those covered, a smidge less than half have < 75% statement coverage. - " > > >" " , 20% have < 50% statement coverage. > > > > Is it possible to ge

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:42:33PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:07:26AM -0600, chromatic wrote: >> > > - Of those covered, a smidge less than half have < 75% statement >

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Tels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Moin, On 21-Oct-01 Paul Johnson tried to scribble about: > I ran this last night, and supply the results here without comment save: Thank you for your work! I looked at BigFloat.pm, noticed a untested line in facmp(), added tests and lo and behold, there was

Re: Preliminary test coverage analysis

2001-10-21 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 07:40:11PM +0200, Tels wrote: > Thank you for your work! I looked at BigFloat.pm, noticed a untested line > in facmp(), added tests and lo and behold, there was a bug! (bacmp(5,+inf) > returned 1 but should return -1 ;) Hah! It was all worth it :-) > Wow ;) Indeed. --