ext/POSIX/t/posix.t #10 on VMS (was Re: VMS failures)

2001-11-14 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 12:07 AM 11/9/2001 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: >On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 11:03:45PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: >> At 10:18 PM -0500 11/8/01, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> >Running bleadperl 12907 I'm getting some failures: >> > >> >ext/POSIX/t/posix.t >> >Test #10 is disappearing, which mean

Re: ext/POSIX/t/posix.t #10 on VMS (was Re: VMS failures)

2001-11-14 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:25:57PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: > >Test #10 is only printed if a SIGINT is received. > > OK, I've tried to reproduce the masking of SIGINT in C, and if I've > understood what the test is trying to do and implemented it right (both > somewhat iffy) we do get the S

Re: ext/POSIX/t/posix.t #10 on VMS (was Re: VMS failures)

2001-11-14 Thread Craig A. Berry
At 03:28 PM 11/14/2001 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: >On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:25:57PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: >> >> OK, I've tried to reproduce the masking of SIGINT in C, >Works fine on Linux, so I think you're on the right track. Thanks. >Don't know how to compile & run anything u

Re: ext/POSIX/t/posix.t #10 on VMS (was Re: VMS failures)

2001-11-14 Thread PPrymmer
I see the output: Caught SIGHUP should see this before SIGINT Caught SIGINT Done -- should have seen SIGINT with DEC C V6.0-001 on VMS V7.3 as well as will Compaq C V6.2-009 on VMS V7.3. Peter Prymmer

Re: ext/POSIX/t/posix.t #10 on VMS (was Re: VMS failures)

2001-11-14 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:51:49PM -0600, Craig A. Berry wrote: > >Don't know how to compile & run anything under OpenVMS to verify there. > > The general steps are: > > $ cc foo! assumes foo.c, creates foo.obj > $ link foo ! assumes foo.obj, creates foo.exe > $ run foo ! assu