The good news is Nick Clark just wrote a test for Benchmark! The bad
news is I made the mistake at looking closer at ext/B/ today, so the
list just got bigger and quite a bit harder.
There's still some fruit that's below giraffe-level, lib and re.
B::Asmdata *new*
B::Assembler
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:26:35PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I forget where the wiki is.
WikiHere
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedModules
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Michael G Schwern:
# lib *new*
I don't know what directory this should go into, so I'm not providing a
patch, just pasting the body of lib.t in here. Good enough?
#!./perl
use Test::More tests => 3;
use lib 'stuff';
#create a directory and a module
mkdir('stuff', 0666)
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:21:08AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:18:43PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > The good news is Nick Clark just wrote a test for Benchmark! The bad
> > news is I made the mistake at looking closer at ext/B/ today, so the
> > list just g
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 02:48:07PM -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
> I don't know what directory this should go into,
lib/lib.t I guess.
> so I'm not providing a
> patch, just pasting the body of lib.t in here. Good enough?
>
> #!./perl
>
> use Test::More tests => 3;
> use lib 'stuff';
>
> #create
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:50:16PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 12:21:08AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:18:43PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > > The good news is Nick Clark just wrote a test for Benchmark! The bad
> > > news is I
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:57:06PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > #how about use's?
> > is(
> > `perl "-Mlib=stuff -MYup" -e "print 'ok'"`,
> > 'ok',
> > 'affects use'
> > );
>
> A simple way to trick 'use' is to clear the entry from %INC and then
> eval "use Yup".
I just though
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:18:43 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> ExtUtils::MM_Cygwin
Here's a test for that. It could use someone on Cygwin testing it. Tels said
he would, but apparently got busy.
-- c
--- ~MANIFEST Sun Nov 25 19:50:46 2001
+++ MANIFESTSun Nov 25 21:08:01 2001
@@ -930,6
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:20:24PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:18:43 -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > ExtUtils::MM_Cygwin
>
> Here's a test for that. It could use someone on Cygwin testing it.
> Tels said he would, but apparently got busy.
Checks out ok on Cygwin98.
--
Thanks both for the testing & bugfixes. Here's the escaping portion of
changes from 0.2 to 0.3, does this seem better?
There's also a test script for the escaping now :). I'd love to test
characters for codepoints > 0xff, but they're borken / unsupported in
all released perls, I think. Other r
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 02:41:13AM -0500, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> There's also a test script for the escaping now :). I'd love to test
> characters for codepoints > 0xff, but they're borken / unsupported in
> all released perls, I think.
Broken is such an ugly word. "Experimental" :)
5.6.1's
11 matches
Mail list logo
