On Saturday, August 24, 2002, at 11:08 pm, chromatic wrote:
> I've been using Test::Exception on a project and am very glad to have
> it. I
> ran into a small issue trying to install it, though: it has TODO tests,
> but
> those failed as the existing version of Test::Harness (1.26 or so) did
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Adrian Howard wrote:
> Can anybody give me a definitive version of when TODO tests started
> working in Test::Harness? From the Changes file I'm currently assuming
> everything after Test::Harness 2.03 inclusive should be okay.
>
> Personally, I would tend towards leaving the
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 10:29:25PM +0900, Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
> Here's a patch for Test::(Simple|More) to allow idioms like
>
> my $obj = Foo->new;
> ok($obj, 'object is defined');
>
> Without this patch, passed $obj was referenced in Test::Builder, so
> REFCNT doesn't come to 0 before
On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 03:08:08PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> I've been using Test::Exception on a project and am very glad to have it. I
> ran into a small issue trying to install it, though: it has TODO tests, but
> those failed as the existing version of Test::Harness (1.26 or so) did not
> und
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 06:55:46AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > +If C detects that it is not running in interactively (say,
> > +if it is running from a CPAN shell), or if the PERL_MM_USE_DEFAULT
> > +environment variable is set to true, the $default will be used without
> > +prompting. This pre
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:48:45AM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
> I've added a patch to Test::Exception (should have spotted that... *bad*
> Adrian :-). It should be hitting CPAN in the next few minutes.
You shouldn't need it, but it can't hurt.
> Can anybody give me a definitive version of when
