Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:43:43AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > The reason I'm saying it might not be much use to people unfamiliar with
> > the internals of unix is precisely because it does return a precisely defined
> > but not directly usefu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> En op 4 oktober 2002 sprak Michael G Schwern:
> > The problem is when you put those two next to each other, one
> > promising a friendly interface, one a bare-metal interface,
> > it confuses the intent of the module. Is it for Joe End User
> > or is it for Joe Core Ha
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:35:14PM -0400, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
> If "what it does" is merely return the value of the C sbrk() function,
> then IMHO, sbrk() is a perfectly good name.
>
> However, as to other possible names -- how about ProcessSize() ? I'm
> not sure if this is really a valid
