Michael G Schwern wrote
>Hmmm. concat.t is wy too basic to use Test::More on it. delete.t
>is pushing it. die.t and die_exit.t cannot be tested with Test::More
>since it relies on that functionality.
>
Okay, not a problem. I can clean up the prints anyway:
print "not " unless some_c
I've switched over to using is() for anything that wasn't an '==' test'
on funky
numeric values; there are a lot of those in (e.g.) bop.t, and I didn't
want to
change the fundamental nature of the tests. I've also gotten my diff format
right this time. :)
So here are:
- avhv.t
- bop.t
- cha
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:18:31PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> >Hmmm. concat.t is wy too basic to use Test::More on it. delete.t
> >is pushing it. die.t and die_exit.t cannot be tested with Test::More
> >since it relies on that functionality.
> >
> Okay, not a problem. I can clean up the pr
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> I've switched over to using is() for anything that wasn't an '=='
> test' on funky numeric values; there are a lot of those in (e.g.)
> bop.t, and I didn't want to change the fundamental nature of the
> tests. I've also gotten my diff
