On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:26:03PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> In article <20010918185441.J585@blackrider>, "Michael G Schwern"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's on my TODO list to decouple the guts of Test::Simple from the external
> > functions, so it's easier to write Test modules based on
In article <20010918185441.J585@blackrider>, "Michael G Schwern"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's on my TODO list to decouple the guts of Test::Simple from the external
> functions, so it's easier to write Test modules based on it, but it's about
> two or three levels down on the list.
What mig
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 12:38:45AM +0200, Mattia Barbon wrote:
> Currently P::T provides three functions:
> output_is/isnt/like, which are wrappers to
> Test::More::is/isnt/like.
>
> The failure output is:
> t/op/integerok 24/26# Failed test (Parrot/Test.pm at line 73)
>
> it would be ni
Currently P::T provides three functions:
output_is/isnt/like, which are wrappers to
Test::More::is/isnt/like.
The failure output is:
t/op/integerok 24/26# Failed test (Parrot/Test.pm at line 73)
it would be nice:
t/op/integerok 24/26# Failed test (t/op/integer.t line xyz)
To do
