I'm implementing is_cmp() inside Test::Builder and I figured it would be nice if is_eq, is_num, isnt_eq and isnt_num all just went through that. And thus Test::More's is() and isnt().
This would mean is($got, $expect) becomes is_cmp($got, 'eq', $expect) and isnt() becomes is_cmp($got, 'ne', $expect). Trouble is the special undef vs 0 vs '' handling which was just added in 0.34. If is() becomes a straight translation to is_cmp($got, 'eq', $expect) we lose that feature. So the question is, leave is() as a special case or make it a pure eq again? I don't like having special magic in Test::More. OTOH, the current behavior of is() is difficult to emulate otherwise. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One I will personally promise to glare sternly at such people. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
