Test::More diagostics problem

2003-02-27 Thread Fergal Daly
There's a line missing from Test::More::_deep_check(). It results in funny diagnostics after comparing scalar refs, so perl -MTest::More=no_plan -e 'is_deeply([(\a) x 5, b], [(\a) x 5, c])' gives # Structures begin differing at: # $got-[0][1][2][3][4][5] = 'b' #

Re: Test::More::is_deeply problems with blessings and stringified refs

2003-02-27 Thread Fergal Daly
On Thursday 27 February 2003 20:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:32:42PM +, Fergal Daly wrote: I think that although a test that ignores blessed classes could be handy in some circumstances (ie programming in general), I reckon in the context of test suites it's a