On Fri, 03 May 2002 11:36:46 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sadahiro
Tomoyuki) wrote:
> But Unicode 3.1 extends U+ notation beyond 0x.
Ah! Thanks for the reference.
So maybe that is no longer necessary... by the time 5.8.0 is out,
Unicode 3.2 will have been current for a while. Or should we
I have just released Encode-InCharset-0.01, available as
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/Encode-InCharset-0.01.tar.gz and CPAN.
I have developed this module primarily to implement ISO-2022-JP-3 and
ISO-2022-CN in future. To implement encode() in these, you have to know
which character set a
On Fri, 3 May 2002 02:30:11 +0300
Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:01:34AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 May 2002 07:00:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) wrote:
> >
> > > Change 16302 by jhi@alpha on 2002/05/01 12:54:24
> > >
>
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:57:42AM +0900, Dan Kogai wrote:
> jhi,
>
> I've submitted this yesterday but it seems it gets simply overlooked
> (got no positive or negative response) so here we go again.
Already applied, #16354.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special
jhi,
I've submitted this yesterday but it seems it gets simply overlooked
(got no positive or negative response) so here we go again.
Dan
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 12:44 , Dan Kogai wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 11:23 , Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>> perlunicode.pod and "User-defined
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:01:34AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2002 07:00:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) wrote:
>
> > Change 16302 by jhi@alpha on 2002/05/01 12:54:24
> >
> > Provide the \N{U+} syntax before we forget.
>
> Do we also want to support U-HH
I wonder how's Laszlo's doing when I released Encode 1.67, available as
follows.
Whole:
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/Encode-1.67.tar.gz and CPAN
Diff agains current: 147 lines
http://www.dan.co.jp/~dankogai/current-1.67.diff.gz
And Changes. As you see changes are just cosmeti
