Le 3 janv. 04, à 15:49, Jarkko Hietaniemi a écrit :
I'm afraid, the process of taking NFD followed by removing \pM
characters
(remove_accent() as below) would remove marks other than accents too
much.
Say, it replaces '≠' (U+2260, ) with '=' ()
since a mathematic "negation slash" is encoded by
Martin Duerst wrote:
in 5.6 and 5.8, but _in_principle_ the bytes pragma should tell Perl in
both 5.6 and 5.8 that "I want bytes, darn it."
But you still get into problem when you pass UTF-8 flagged variables to
legacy modules without the pragma.
Yes, that seems to do the job. But is this availab
I'm afraid, the process of taking NFD followed by removing \pM
characters
(remove_accent() as below) would remove marks other than accents too
much.
Say, it replaces '≠' (U+2260, ) with '=' ()
since a mathematic "negation slash" is encoded by U+0338
which is to be removed.
Also, although they
5.00503, 5.6.x and 5.8.x. I don't think that the tricks you need to
program around the Unicode cliffs through perl versions are collected
in a document.
I think now that people have had time to "Unicodify" their applications
with 5.8.x, starting to collect the tricks required and found useful
woul
If it were just me, that would be easy. But stating on an FAQ
page 'use Perl 5.8.1 or later' for something that worked
probably even in Perl 4 doesn't look like a good idea.
Perl 4? And here I was being afraid that getting 5.6 to work right
would
be tricky... :-) I think we need to define "work"
