Hi,
This is Rajarshi expressing Sastry's viewpoints since he's on vacation.
SADAHIRO Tomoyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:06:56 +0530, Sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote> > > > As suggested by you, I ran the following script which resulted in> > > substituting all the charact
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:06:56 +0530, Sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> > > As suggested by you, I ran the following script which resulted in
> > > substituting all the characters with X irrespective of the "special
> > > case" [i-j].
> > >
> > > ($a = "\x89\x8a\x8b\x8c\x8d\x8f\x90\x91") =~ s/[\
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:11:45PM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> On 8/9/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:58:48AM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> > > > $enc_string = encode("iso-8859-16", $string);
> > So $enc_string should be a single byte, 97, everywhere.
> Can you su
On 8/9/05, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:58:48AM +0530, Sastry wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I get 73 printed on EBCDIC platform. I think it is supposed to print
> > 129 as it is the numeric equivalent of 'a'.
> >
> > -Sastry
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/8/05, Nicholas Cla
On 8/9/05, SADAHIRO Tomoyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:09:42 +0530, Sastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > Hi
> >
> > As suggested by you, I ran the following script which resulted in
> > substituting all the characters with X irrespective of the "special
> > case
Hi
a)Can somebody tell me how miniperl uses enc2xs to generate the
codepage tables in ext/Encode/Byte/byte_t.c and ext/Encode/def_t.c?
b)Are these tables different on ASCII and EBCDIC platform?
-Sastry
