Sadahiro Tomoyuki wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:44:00 +0100
Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the multi-lingual server scenario I was initially discussing, would
one of the following usages be correct (yes, it's just pseudocode and
exists in a world where no errors ever occur!):
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 23:44:00 +0100
Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I now realise that some per-language tailoring would be needed for sensible
results. Unicode::Collate::Locale seems like the kind of think I was
looking for, and any tailoring is better than none :)
Using the multi-lingual
I think, for a script representing usually one language,
allkeys.txt defines fairly acceptable collation order.
For example, order of hiragana and katakana is approximately
compliant with the custom of the Japanese language.
In contrast, for a script representing many languages
(say, the
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:29:08 +
Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
How should collation be handled in multitasking, multilingual applications -
in particular forking servers such as apache/mod_perl based web apps?
I can assume the following:
1) I'll know the preferred language via
Hello
How should collation be handled in multitasking, multilingual applications -
in particular forking servers such as apache/mod_perl based web apps?
I can assume the following:
1) I'll know the preferred language via a RFC2616 language tag.
2) All data will be utf8 encoded Unicode.
3) The
