Re: Encoding vs Charset

2002-03-27 Thread Keld Jørn Simonsen
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:59:10AM -0500, Jungshik Shin wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Dan Kogai wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 11:22 , Jungshik Shin wrote: > > > IMHO, you're also misusing the term 'charset' here. MIME charset > > > can be used synonymously with 'encodings' (or >

Re: Encoding vs Charset

2002-03-27 Thread Jungshik Shin
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Dan Kogai wrote: > On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 11:22 , Jungshik Shin wrote: > > IMHO, you're also misusing the term 'charset' here. MIME charset > > can be used synonymously with 'encodings' (or > > character set encoding scheme: see CJKV Information Processing, > > IE

Re: Encoding vs Charset

2002-03-26 Thread Jungshik Shin
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Jungshik Shin wrote: > > really means euc-cn and charset="ks_c_5601-1987" really menas euc-kr. > > Sadly this misconception is enbedded to popular browsers. > M$ OE, M$ Frontpage keep producing html docs. However, > it also has to be noted that the encoding > designated as

Re: Encoding vs Charset

2002-03-26 Thread Jungshik Shin
>And I have found that most of Chinese (Continental; seems like > Taiwanese are much more technically correct) and Korean mails and web > pages confuse "charset" and "encodings". That is, charset="gb2312" IMHO, you're also misusing the term 'charset' here. MIME charset can be used syno