Re: Looping with Unicode

2003-03-07 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
> logical semantics for this would be rather ... odd. What should > "a"..chr(0x100) generate, for example? The above would be strange because there are non-\w characters in that range, so it's kind of like the range numerically but with holes. Even stranger would be "a"..chr(0x100).chr(0x100) I

Re: Encode 1.87 and later don't pass make test on static perl

2003-03-07 Thread Blair Zajac
Dan Kogai wrote: > > Sorry, my finger has slipped. > > On Thursday, Mar 6, 2003, at 22:48 Asia/Tokyo, Dan Kogai wrote: > > On Thursday, Mar 6, 2003, at 04:10 Asia/Tokyo, Blair Zajac wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have several self compiled copies of Perl 5.8.0, one of which is > > compiled to be st

Re: Looping with Unicode

2003-03-07 Thread Daniel Yacob
>> Can something be set in the script to make it work as expected? >> >> An observation; UTF-8 keys in a hash can be defined without >> quotation: >> >> %myHash =( >>=> "this", >>=> "that", >> : : : >> ); >> >> but later the keys must be referenced in quoted form. T

Re: Looping with Unicode

2003-03-07 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
I verified the intent from Larry, and ".." is definitely (and will be, at least in Perl 5) only ever meant for doing the expansion on the "A".."Z", "a".."z" (and "0..9") ranges. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stabl