Jeffrey wrote:
> --- $Bill Luebkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>No they don't. In a switch, you can fall thru one
>>case into the next if you
>>
>>like or you can break our of the switch. YOu can't
>>do that with an if. :)
>>
>
> The only time I've found this to be useful is when you
> a
Never mind, I've found it. And it works great. Thanks a lot.
Greg
>>> "Greg Wardawy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/01/02 01:27PM >>>
>>> "Greg Wardawy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/01/02 12:22PM >>>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/01/02 12:05PM >>>
Greg,
Look into the Storable package.
http://aspn.activestate.
- Original Message -
From: "James S. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:30 PM
Subject: comparing two arrays, removing elements
> Hi all,
>
> I'm having a logic gap in my code.. Can't quite figure out the
best way
> to do this.
>
> I have tw
James,
Does the following code do what you want? The first step is ro cache the
indices of the most recent files. This can be done with a hash table,
keyed off of file name, that saves date and index. When a later date is
found, replace the current hash record. The final step is to strip all b
Jim,
Solving the 'array content sorting' issue... you could ignore using two
arrays and just a hash table...
--- snip ---
foreach (@patchlist) {
chomp;
($name, $date, $arch, $file) = split ',';
$id = $name.",".$arch.",".$file;
if (exists $patch{$id}) {
if ($date gt $patch{$id}) {$patch
--- $Bill Luebkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No they don't. In a switch, you can fall thru one
> case into the next if you
>
> like or you can break our of the switch. YOu can't
> do that with an if. :)
The only time I've found this to be useful is when you
are doing things like case-inse
Burak Gürsoy wrote:
> Perl6 will have it ;) there are some articles about this in perl.com... but
> I never needed switch-case... if/elsif/else do the same thing.
No they don't. In a switch, you can fall thru one case into the next if you
like or you can break our of the switch. YOu can't d
Hi all,
I'm having a logic gap in my code.. Can't quite figure out the best way
to do this.
I have two arrays.. Each item in the array has some comma seperated
values. The first value is the beginning name of the file, the second
value is the standard 10 digit date stamp where the larger th
If all you're doing is running command-line apps on the UNIX box,
Net::Telnet should do what you want. If you're looking at doing distributed
computing (invoking methods on one machine and doing something with the
return value on another machine), take a look at SOAP::Lite
(www.soaplite.com)
HT
Suppose my Win32 machine has access to a Unix machine over our network.
What would I need (modules?) to write a Win32 Perl script on my machine that
would log on to and send commands to the Unix server? Perhaps, for instance,
I want to fire some scripts for a language I don't have on my Win32 mac
>>> "Greg Wardawy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/01/02 12:22PM >>>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/01/02 12:05PM >>>
Greg,
Look into the Storable package.
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/CodeDoc/Storable/Storable.html
Tim
_
Tim Moose | T R I L O G Y
voice (5
>system "my_command 2>&1 NUL"
First time I see this syntax.
As far as I can say, it doesn't work.
The correct form should be :
my_command > NUL 2>&1
_
Bruno Bellenger
Sr. Network/Systems Administrator
-Original Message--
Hello.
This code unzip files from $zip_path to $extr_path, but when you
uncomment, tree lines below, then this code unzip files from $zip_path
to './'. Where is a bug?
Sorry, but my english is so bad.
---
use warnings;
use strict;
use locale;
use Archive::Zip::Tree;
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/01/02 12:05PM >>>
Greg,
Look into the Storable package.
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/CodeDoc/Storable/Storable.html
Tim
_
Tim Moose | T R I L O G Y
voice (512) 874-5342
fax (512) 874-8500
___
Greg,
Look into the Storable package.
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/CodeDoc/Storable/Storable.html
Tim
_
Tim Moose | T R I L O G Y
voice (512) 874-5342
fax (512) 874-8500
___
Perl-Win32-Users mailing
Hello all,
I'm trying to figure out how to avoid running the same database query inside the
scripts started via a system call from the parent script.
It doesn't make much sense to run the same query, build the same hash tables and use
their values in all scripts - I should run the query once
I'm not an expert on this subject, but I'll give my explanation why your
example didn't work.
"2>&1" in your example is getting the STDOUT and STDERR from "perl
test1.pl".
"_Perl_" did not return the expected output; test1.pl did. Your example is
capturing the output of "Perl". It didn't have
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Wessels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Abner, Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "perl win32 users"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lawrence Lordanich (x11486)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "porters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: capturing
18 matches
Mail list logo
