On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Foo JH wrote:
> Just raising my hand that I'm eagerly awaiting the release of
> 5.10...what's the news?
I think it will be "soon", as in the next month or two.
Note that this is a guess, not a promise, as I have no control over it.
Cheers,
-Jan
_
Just raising my hand that I'm eagerly awaiting the release of
5.10...what's the news?
___
Perl-Win32-Users mailing list
Perl-Win32-Users@listserv.ActiveState.com
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
The file perl\lib\CORE\patchlevel.h defines:
#define PERL_REVISION 5 /* age */
#define PERL_VERSION8 /* epoch */
#define PERL_SUBVERSION 8 /* generation */
Is the build number (e.g., 822) defined somewhere?
If not, what is a good way for a make file (such as
Jan Dubois wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Suresh Govindachar wrote:
>>
>> Here's what I came up with for a patch to account for two new
>> symbols (Perl_sv_2iv_flags, Perl_newXS_flags) introduced in
>> ActiveState perl for build 822 and later (these symbols were
>> preventing the buil
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Suresh Govindachar wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here's what I came up with for a patch to account for two new
> symbols (Perl_sv_2iv_flags, Perl_newXS_flags) introduced in
> ActiveState perl for build 822 and later (these symbols were
> preventing the building of vim with dy
Hello,
Here's what I came up with for a patch to account for two new
symbols (Perl_sv_2iv_flags, Perl_newXS_flags) introduced in
ActiveState perl for build 822 and later (these symbols were
preventing the building of vim with dynamic support for perl).
After patching, I tested building
