[OT] Having multiple x64 compilers on Windows Vista 64

2009-05-27 Thread Sisyphus
Hi, I currently have the "Microsoft Platform SDK for Windows Server 2003 R2" compiler. I would like to also install "Windows SDK for Windows Server 2008 and .NET Framework 3.5" from http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=E6E1C3DF-A74F-4207-8586-711EBE331CDC&displaylang=en . W

RE: Problem iwth perl tk : Creation of file based on options

2009-05-27 Thread Brian Raven
From: perl-win32-users-boun...@listserv.activestate.com [mailto:perl-win32-users-boun...@listserv.activestate.com] On Behalf Of Perl Perl Sent: 27 May 2009 15:40 To: perl-win32-users@listserv.activestate.com Subject: Problem iwth perl tk : Creation of file based on options > Hi All, > >

Problem iwth perl tk : Creation of file based on options

2009-05-27 Thread Perl Perl
Hi All, I have to create files based on the ext1 - ext2 and write few lines of code there. The created file should have to option like like update and save so that user can edit the file in future. For this I choose the Radiobatton option of Perl/Tk. Here I am doing a very silly mistake, an

Re: ActivePerl -x64, and another problem with mixing compilers.

2009-05-27 Thread Foo JH
Jan Dubois wrote: > It is normal if you are running Vista or 2008 Server, in which case > this tree contains every single file of the OS (including the > components that have not been "installed"). All other "installed" files > are really just NTFS hardlinks into this tree. omg. Thanks for the r

Re: ActivePerl -x64, and another problem with mixing compilers.

2009-05-27 Thread Sisyphus
- Original Message - From: "Jan Dubois" >> That's one helluva directory on my machine: 13 GB 14,121 folders >> 51,537 files >> >> Is that normal ? > > It is normal if you are running Vista or 2008 Server Yep - I've got Windows Vista. Makes you wonder how we ever got by when hard drive