Re: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-13 Thread John_Wunderlich
cc: eState.com Subject: Preferred PERL

RE: Re: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-13 Thread Sundara Rajan
'Mark Bergeron'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re: Preferred PERL Editor Mark - The link you sent for open-perl-ide is not a perl site at all. It redirects you to a ridiculous site that has pop up window after pop up window. The content didn't appear to have anything to do wi

Re: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-13 Thread Denis Pleic
Hi folks, For those looking for something powerful (emacs-style), but are intimidated by sheer size of (X)Emacs on either Windows or Linux, I wholehartedly recommend Jasspa MicroEmacs (www.jasspa.com). It's GPLed, works on both platforms, and is rather small (can be squeezed to under 1MB for

Re: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-11 Thread $Bill Luebkert
Martin Moss wrote: > Doesn't anybody still use VI these days?? :-) VI(M) - yes. Only thing always available on UNIX with a very good Win32 GUI port. Probably faster than any of the others and on more platforms. Emacs may be more powerful, but has a longer learning curve and not the best de

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Martin Moss
I find that VIM for windows is my preferred windows editor too:-) > -Original Message- > From: Warkentin, Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday 10 May 2002 15:58 > To: 'Martin Moss'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Preferred PERL Editor > >

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Warkentin, Brad
Martin Moss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] ponders: > Doesn't anybody still use VI these days?? :-) vim for quick and dirty (faster launch times), XEmacs for real editing bj ___ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listse

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Tillman, James
> Doesn't anybody still use VI these days?? :-) > Strangely enough, I use vim for system admin tasks and Xemacs for coding. Talk about a schizo! Vim almost always installed on *nix and easy to get for Win32 via CygWin so having "vim reflexes" at the command line is handy, but I like Xemacs's

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Martin Moss
revena; Simon Oliver > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Preferred PERL Editor > > > > It's not an editor... its a lifestyle... though in the spirit of full > > disclosure, now that OS's have GUIs I do wander out of Emacs > > to do some > > stuff. >

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Tillman, James
> It's not an editor... its a lifestyle... though in the spirit of full > disclosure, now that OS's have GUIs I do wander out of Emacs > to do some > stuff. Not to start YET ANOTHER RELIGIOUS WAR (YARW), but XEmacs does quite nicely on both Linux and Win32. So you can have your GUI and your EMA

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Warkentin, Brad
Lee Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Okay, where do I get Xemacs? > Only kdding - getting it now... Welcome to the one true editor... :-) It's not an editor... its a lifestyle... though in the spirit of full disclosure, now that OS's have GUIs I do wander out of Emacs to do some stu

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Lee Goddard
Okay, where do I get Xemacs? Only kdding - getting it now... ___ Perl-Win32-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs

RE: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Aaron Trevena
re: emacs > > >Also, no blinking bracket matching, doesn't understand qq{}, qw//, etc. > > > > What is blinking bracket matching? > Xemacs blinks the matching bracket when your on the other match. Xemacs also has other nifty features such as warning you of unmatched heredoc, brackets and incompl

Re: Preferred PERL Editor

2002-05-10 Thread Simon Oliver
Lee Goddard wrote: > > >Also, no blinking bracket matching, doesn't understand qq{}, qw//, etc. > > What is blinking bracket matching? Xemacs blinks the matching bracket when your on the other match. > It can find the next bracket fo the set if you use CTRL+M: > holding down SHIFT at the same t