Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Programming is not harder than for a sighted, but debugging with the perl
> debugger... is very hard because Active Perl debugger is not (or better said
> very hard) accessible for screen readers.
What about the console debugger - does that work ok ?
You would have to u
> > or how 'bout difference between "insensitive" and "clueless dolt" ?
>
>
> Point taken. My intent was not to belittle. I am amazed that it's possible
> for someone with little/no sight to accomplish programming and debugging.
>
Programming is not harder than for a sighted, but debugging with t
> > I would like to use Viavoice, because it is more clear than MS
> text-to-speech, and I am blind, so I would like to use it in
> some applications.
>
> > Teddy
>
>
> Um Not to be insensitive. But this makes no sense
> at all. If you are blind to the point that you need to have
> te
At 12:00 AM 7/26/05 -0700, robert wrote:
>> Um Not to be insensitive. But this makes no sense
>> at all. If you are blind to the point that you need to have
>> text narrated, how do you manage to program?
I don't need to look at the keyboard to type. I don't even need my eyes
open to
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 2:39 PM
>
>
> > I would like to use Viavoice, because it is more clear than MS
> text-to-speech, and I am blind, so I would like to use it in
> some applications.
>
> > Teddy
>
>
> Um Not to be
From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: text-to-speech
> > I would like to use Viavoice, because it is more clear than MS
> text-to-speech, and I am blind, so I would like to use it in some
> applications.
>
> > Teddy
>
>
> Um Not to b
> I would like to use Viavoice, because it is more clear than MS
text-to-speech, and I am blind, so I would like to use it in some
applications.
> Teddy
Um Not to be insensitive. But this makes no sense at all. If you
are blind to the point that you need to have text narrated, how do y
