Re: Rebuilding config_h.SH

2005-05-27 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:46:55 -0500 (EST), Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > On Mon 03 Jan 2005 20:52, Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > > > > > In order to get in sync, I re

Re: Rebuilding config_h.SH

2005-01-04 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Mon 03 Jan 2005 20:52, Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > > > In order to get in sync, I rebuilt config_h.SH with metaconfig, and the > > > content was the same, but reshuffled (reordered)

Re: Rebuilding config_h.SH

2005-01-04 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Mon 03 Jan 2005 20:52, Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > In order to get in sync, I rebuilt config_h.SH with metaconfig, and the > > content was the same, but reshuffled (reordered) > > > > This cause HAS_QUAD to be too far down and a

Re: Rebuilding config_h.SH

2005-01-03 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > In order to get in sync, I rebuilt config_h.SH with metaconfig, and the > content was the same, but reshuffled (reordered) > > This cause HAS_QUAD to be too far down and also LONGLONG to be used before > defined If I recall correctly, the dependencies