--- Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@out = sort
key( %lookup{ .{remotekey} } ),
key:insensitive:descending:locale( 'somewhere' )( .{priority} ),
key:float ( substr( 0, 10 ) ),
key:integer ( /foo(\d+)bar/ ),
AH == Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AH --- Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@out = sort
key:compare( \my_compare_sub ) ( /(\d+)$/ ),
@in ;
note that the custome compare callbacks can be a block or a sub
name/ref. the callback sub would be passed 2 args as usual.
--- Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AH == Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AH --- Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@out = sort
key:compare( \my_compare_sub ) ( /(\d+)$/ ),
@in ;
note that the custome compare callbacks can be a block or a sub
AH == Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AH --- Uri Guttman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there are rare times when you need a computed comparison, say with
a specialized collation sequence. if this sequence isn't supported
by locale or whatever, you need to do a callback
Austin Hastings wrote:
Off the top of my head, I can't think of a case where the compare sub
would be needed unless the key was not well-ordered. Does anyone have
an example of a case where the key-extraction sub approach doesn't
reduce the problem to a Scalar comparison?
I can't find the P5
Alberto Manuel Brandao Simoes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know head can not compile at all, but maybe this can help to know that
the following tests fail on my Slackware Linux:
t/pmc/signalNOK 2# Failed test (t/pmc/signal.t at line 44)
These signal tests are a big hack. Parrot
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm still working on the vtable and supporting code section,
most of the revamp of PDD15 (objects!) is checked into the
repository. It'd be worth checking it out and checking it out, as
this would be the time to get comments in.
1) Why is the
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:48:09AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I don't know suns JIT code nor the assembler syntax, but it seems that
the two subcc lines are broken:
emitm_subcc_r(NATIVECODE, MAP[1], emitm_g(0), emitm_g(0));
If I understand that correctly it should read:
Stephane Peiry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
whats a good way to debug jit?
s. docs/jit.pod /Debugging
docs/debug.pod /jit
Thanks,
Stephane
leo
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:35:02PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
docs/debug.pod /jit
saw that one, but jit doesn't generate a .o file under sparc?
Stéphane
Stephane Peiry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:35:02PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
docs/debug.pod /jit
saw that one, but jit doesn't generate a .o file under sparc?
Calling Parrot_jit_debug() is enabled for __GNUC__ and __IBMC__. If your
system doesn't define one of
While I'm still working on the vtable and supporting code section,
most of the revamp of PDD15 (objects!) is checked into the repository.
It'd be worth checking it out and checking it out, as this would be
the time to get comments in.
great to see this, i guess everyone will agree. well, i have
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
We also have to have a way to fetch the method PMC for a named method
for later use, which is where the interesting bits come in.
This is required for a number of reasons, including Python, so we
have to have it. The question is... *When* is the name
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004, Michal Wallace wrote:
class Alice:
def whoami(self):
return Alice
class Bruce:
def whoami(self):
return Bruce
a = Alice()
b = Bruce()
a.whoami, b.whoami = b.whoami, a.whoami
assert a.whoami()==Bruce
Michal Wallace writes:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
We also have to have a way to fetch the method PMC for a named method
for later use, which is where the interesting bits come in.
This is required for a number of reasons, including Python, so we
have to have it. The
15 matches
Mail list logo
