Timur Safin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (AFAIK) all systems: opcode_type = intval_type = long. This size has
to match the pointer size. And floatval_type = double.
It was not exactly true till recent (the counter sample is
Another week's gone. One benchmark (b1.py) is running with Parrot. The
code is produced by languages/python/pie-thon.pl. The speed is
competitive :)
More below.
leo
The Pie-thon state - 4
# date [- range ] title
# description
10.07.2004 Pie-thon 45 - 47
Enhanced complex
At 8:10 AM +0200 7/17/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
14.07.2004 *Dan's already starting with the Bytecode converter - SNCR*
SNCR? Selective Non-catalytic Reaction? Erm... Okay... :)
--
Dan
--it's like this---
Dan
Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 8:10 AM +0200 7/17/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
14.07.2004 *Dan's already starting with the Bytecode converter - SNCR*
SNCR? Selective Non-catalytic Reaction? Erm... Okay... :)
Or a lysdexic variant of SCNR
leo
Given the following program:
def test(x):
return 0
print test(2)
Python 2.3.3 prints 0, but pie-thon.pl and parrot print 2. From the
generated PIR, it looks like test is returning an integer but the
caller expects a PMC.
Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And if we do that, I guess that means that $«file».ext could be
made to work as a replacement, which seems conceptually clean if you
don't think about it too hard.
Now that you put it that way, $( $file ).ext doesn't seem so bad, the
visually-distracting
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
my $fh = open $filename :excl;
Can we please not name it with a random character generator? How
about something that communicates what it does in some fashion, at
least well enough to function as a mnemonic?
my $fh = open $filename :rw :noreplace;
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 09:47:14AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
: Or a lysdexic variant of SCNR
A lysdexic would be a Greek with a broken right hand...
Larry
If an array element knows that it is an array element, this can be
useful:
for @foo { push @bar, .splice if EXPR }
Juerd
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 06:53:28PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
If an array element knows that it is an array element, this can be
useful:
for @foo { push @bar, .splice if EXPR }
What happens if the element is an element of more than one array?
--
A power surge on the Bridge is rapidly and
Dave Mitchell skribis 2004-07-17 18:24 (+0100):
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 06:53:28PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
If an array element knows that it is an array element, this can be
useful:
for @foo { push @bar, .splice if EXPR }
What happens if the element is an element of more than one array?
Do we have a :) operator yet?
Juerd
-Original Message-
From: Juerd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 17 July, 2004 01:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: :)
Do we have a :) operator yet?
It's an adverbial modifier on the core expression type. Does
nothing, but it acts as a line terminator when nothing but
Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1 .. (some_big_hairy_expression)
^:by(3)
But we'd have to pay really close attention to how indenting is
done. Maybe we should just pass this suggestion on to Guido... :-)
Yes, please leave column-alignment tricks to Python. I don't even
14 matches
Mail list logo
