[perl #33603] Undef != Undef

2004-12-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover # Please include the string: [perl #33603] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=33603 This code: new P0, .Undef new P1, .Undef eq P0, P1, L1

Re: Win32 dynclasses build issues

2004-12-31 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jonathan Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I assume that the dynamic python lib has to export public symbols. You could run one of the failing tests with a debugger and check the Parrot_load_lib() steps. OK, you were right. Once I inserted

Re: [perl #33603] Undef != Undef

2004-12-31 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Simon Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This code: new P0, .Undef new P1, .Undef eq P0, P1, L1 print not L1: print ok\n end prints not ok. Should it? That depends ;) ... If Parrot considers every Undef PMC to be distinct, it's going to make tasks

Re: [perl #33603] Undef != Undef

2004-12-31 Thread Sam Ruby
Leopold Toetsch wrote: Simon Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This code: new P0, .Undef new P1, .Undef eq P0, P1, L1 print not L1: print ok\n end prints not ok. Should it? That depends ;) ... If Parrot considers every Undef PMC to be distinct, it's going to make tasks

Re: [perl #33603] Undef != Undef

2004-12-31 Thread Simon Glover
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Simon Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: new P0, .ResizablePMCArray set P0, 1 clone P1, P0 eq P0, P1, L1 print not L1: print ok print \n end prints not ok. This is a different issue. The