On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:00:53PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
%num_of_linesfile = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
: because the Perl 5 way would put a reference to @file in the hash.
: Scalar context always makes references now, from what I understand.
Interestingly, a stored reference would track
Adrian Howard wrote:
On 18 Apr 2005, at 17:03, David Cantrell wrote:
Number::Phone::UK::Data - no version, this is where the .0004 comes from
though. It has no version number because the
entire file is generated from a *really* dumb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
void class_init() {
+ PMC *just_a_hack;
Well, this isn't just a hack, but an offical way to register objects
within the Parrot DOD registry.
leo
Hi,
quoting an old post from Luke (http://xrl.us/ftet):
Ctieing is going to work quite differently, from what I hear.
So it might be possible to overload any function to call a
special version when your type of array is used. You just have
to write all the special versions.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:14:04AM +0300, wolverian wrote:
: On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 04:00:53PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: %num_of_linesfile = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
:
: : because the Perl 5 way would put a reference to @file in the hash.
: : Scalar context always makes references now, from
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:02:41PM +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
: Hi,
:
: quoting an old post from Luke (http://xrl.us/ftet):
: Ctieing is going to work quite differently, from what I hear.
: So it might be possible to overload any function to call a
: special version when your
I was playing around with pugs's interactive mode and didn't think about
what I was typing. I just typed ? out of force of semi-habit with CLI
tools, and to my shock Pugs SEGVed. Now, I realize that this wasn't
valid input, but still... a SEGV seems like an odd response.
The really frustrating
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:30:15PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
I was playing around with pugs's interactive mode and didn't think about
what I was typing. I just typed ? out of force of semi-habit with CLI
tools, and to my shock Pugs SEGVed. Now, I realize that this wasn't
valid input, but
# New Ticket Created by Francois PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #35041]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=35041
For top Makefile : conversion CVS targets to SVN.
Francois Perrad.
svn.patch
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 09:38 -0700, Francois PERRAD wrote:
For top Makefile : conversion CVS targets to SVN.
Thanks, applied.
-- c
# New Ticket Created by Lambeck
# Please include the string: [perl #35042]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=35042
Hi all,
now that the problem concerning gmp is resolved I noticed 2 other problems:
1.
Bummer, forgot to attach the patch. Here it is.
capture_output_with_stderr.patch
Description: Binary data
Either pmc2c.pl should be deleted or pmc2c2.pl should be renamed to
pmc2c.pl.
A better location might be 'build_tools/pmc2c.pl
Attached is a patch that does just that, including appropriate
documentation changes. Note that these changes involved using 'svn rm'
and 'svn mv'.
On 19 Apr 2005, at 11:40, David Cantrell wrote:
[snip]
The script that generates it doesn't change. The data that it mangles
into a module is the bit that changes.
Can you add a version number to the data?
So I'll take the suggestion of putting MMDD into a version number.
But then wasn't
Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Applied the patch. with some fiddling.
Matt: Could you check whether all changes are in?
Looks good to me. Thanks.
--
matt diephouse
http://matt.diephouse.com
Perl 6 Summary for 2005-04-12 through 2005-04-19
All~
Sadly, a slip of the mouse cause me to delete a partially completed
summary, so I am going to push ahead on the rewrite without a witty
intro. Feel free to make one up for yourself involving stuffed animals,
musicians, and
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 01:51 +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:30:15PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
I was playing around with pugs's interactive mode and didn't think about
what I was typing. I just typed ? out of force of semi-habit with CLI
tools, and to my shock Pugs
Still some GC bugs kicking around that neither Leo nor I have been able to find
yet. (Note that the bug in [string] may actually be a PGE leak, as that code
uses the glob rules).
Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
Hi,
For who didn't noticed it yet: I've committed a memory game into
examples/cgi. As I know, this is the first Perl 6 web application. Have fun!
Bye,
Andras
19 matches
Mail list logo
