Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:14:02AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: m/ (don't) (ray) (me) (for) (solar tea), (d'oh!)
: | (every) (green) (BEM) (devours) (faces)
: /;
This seems like a rather ugly syntax for what is essentially a label,
or a rule. I wonder
Larry Wall wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:14:35PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:08:31PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: : Hmmm, then would $x.$j.2 then be equivalent to $x[$j-1][1] ?
:
: Ouch.
Maybe that's a good reason to switch from 1-based to 0-based
$ vars. No
Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote:
In a release tarball, the .svn directories don't exist, so
config/gen/revision.pl can't find the svn revision number. That's fine,
but it's probably wiser in that case to not report "failed" during the
Configure.pl process, but to simply skip over the missing numbe
On Monday 09 May 2005 19:36, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:51:53PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> > Autrijus wrote:
> > >/me eagerly awaits new revelation from Damian...
> >
> > Be careful what you wish for. Here's draft zero. ;-)
>
> ...and here is my status report of the Zero-D
> "DC" == Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DC> grammar Shell::Commands {
DC> my $lastcmd;
DC> rule cmd { $/:= | $/:= }
DC> rule mv { $lastcmd:=(mv) $:=[ ]+
$:= }
DC> rule cp { $lastcmd:=(cp) $:=[ ]+
$:= }
DC> s
On Friday 06 May 2005 18:17, John Lenz wrote:
> Hi, the following test fails because boolean.pmc actually registers the
> global True as a false boolean, and no boolean for False. It is fixed with
> the patch below.
>
> John
>
>
> find_global P0, "True"
> find_global P1, "False"
>
>
On Mon, 9 May 2005, jerry gay wrote:
>the '.imc' extension has recently fallen out of favor and is being
>replaced with '.pir'. otherwise, looks good and works on
>win32--msvc-7.1--perl-5.8.6.
>
I modified some of the .pod files in imcc/docs/ to reflect using .pir
instead of .imc
Patch attached.
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 10:25:43PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:24:49AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> > Greetings. Attached is a patch that I'm currently using in Pugs's
> > bundled PGE.pbc, in order to make PGE output properly escaped strings,
> > in a format read
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:43:39PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can I say $*1, $*2, etc, to get perl5 flattened peren counting captures?
> We need something like that to make perl5->perl6 translation easier;
> otherwise we'd have to parse perl5 RE instead of just slapping on a ":p5".
> Unle
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #35361]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=35361 >
In a release tarball, the .svn directories don't exist, so
config/gen/revision.pl ca
jerry gay wrote:
On 5/9/05, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- load_bytecode "library/Digest/MD5.imc"
+ load_bytecode "Digest/MD5.imc"
the '.imc' extension has recently fallen out of favor and is being
replaced with '.pir'. otherwise, looks good and works on
win32--msvc-7.1--perl
On 5/9/05, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - load_bytecode "library/Digest/MD5.imc"
> + load_bytecode "Digest/MD5.imc"
the '.imc' extension has recently fallen out of favor and is being
replaced with '.pir'. otherwise, looks good and works on
win32--msvc-7.1--perl-5.8.6.
~jerry
Nick Glencross wrote:
Guys,
this patch makes some small updates to the MD5 files.
...
It would also be interesting for benchmarking, but I haven't got
around to trying
As a rough comparison running the md5sum.imc located in the examples
directory (on Linux/AMD Athlon), I get:
Empty file (to mea
Can I say $*1, $*2, etc, to get perl5 flattened peren counting captures? We
need something like that to make perl5->perl6 translation easier; otherwise
we'd have to parse perl5 RE instead of just slapping on a ":p5". Unless ":p5"
also means that you get a single already fattened match objct.
# New Ticket Created by Jeff Horwitz
# Please include the string: [perl #35365]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=35365 >
the attached patch adds a new signature for spawnw so it can take a PMC
array of argume
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:32:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jeff Horwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] allow array of args for spawnw
the attached patch adds a new signature for spawnw so it can take a PMC
array of arguments rather than a
Guys,
this patch makes some small updates to the MD5 files.
* Remove some code which was retained in case changes for 64-bit
processors didn't work
* Convert some macro temps to be .locals in calling function
* Omit 'library' path in load_bytecode calls
* General cleanup
Leo's previously rep
> "LW" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LW> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:14:35PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
LW> : On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:08:31PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
LW> : : Hmmm, then would $x.$j.2 then be equivalent to $x[$j-1][1] ?
LW> :
LW> : Ouch.
LW>
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:14:35PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:08:31PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: : Hmmm, then would $x.$j.2 then be equivalent to $x[$j-1][1] ?
:
: Ouch.
Maybe that's a good reason to switch from 1-based to 0-based
$ vars. Not sure what that w
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:08:31PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: Hmmm, then would $x.$j.2 then be equivalent to $x[$j-1][1] ?
Ouch.
Larry
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:34:10AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:33:33AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> : After thinking on this a bit, I'm hoping we don't do this -- at least not
> : initially. I'm not sure there's a lot of advantage of C< $1.1 > over
> : C< $1[0] >,
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:33:33AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: After thinking on this a bit, I'm hoping we don't do this -- at least not
: initially. I'm not sure there's a lot of advantage of C< $1.1 > over
: C< $1[0] >, and one starts to wonder about things like $1.$j.2 and
: $1[$j].2 a
Nothing makes you re-think your reply length like having your mailer
lose your message ;-)
A lot of your message revolves around this idea that there's a "normal
file open" semantic. What I've tried (but clearly failed) to articulate
previously is that this notion is becoming archaic in what is sh
> "PRM" == Patrick R Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PRM> After thinking on this a bit, I'm hoping we don't do this -- at least not
PRM> initially. I'm not sure there's a lot of advantage of C< $1.1 > over
PRM> C< $1[0] >, and one starts to wonder about things like $1.$j.2 and
P
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:51:53PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> Autrijus wrote:
>
> >/me eagerly awaits new revelation from Damian...
>
> Be careful what you wish for. Here's draft zero. ;-)
...and here is my status report of the Zero-Day exploit, err,
implementation, in Pugs. :-)
Note that th
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:14:17PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > (gdb) p interpreter->exceptions
> > $5 = (struct parrot_exception_t *) 0x0
>
> > what should have initialised that?
>
> An exception structure is created per entering a run-loop, se
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:14:02AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> : m/ (don't) (ray) (me) (for) (solar tea), (d'oh!)
> : | (every) (green) (BEM) (devours) (faces)
> : /;
>
> This seems like a rather ugly syntax for what is essentially a label,
> or a rule. I wonder if we can com
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 11:02:58AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:47:14AM -0600, Paul Seamons wrote:
> > > =item *
> > >
> > > Quantifiers (except C and C) cause a matched subrule or subpattern
> > > to
> > > return an array of C objects, instead of just a single obj
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:33:33AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: > =head2 Subpattern numbering
: > [...]
: > Of course, the leading Cs that Perl 5 would produce do convey
: > (albeit awkwardly) which alternative actually matched. If that
: > information is important, Perl 6 has several far cle
Matt Diephouse (via RT) wrote:
This was done with the help of `svn mv`. It may be easier to give me
a committer bit
Yep. Confirmed.
The ususal caveats apply: always "make test" before committing and don't
forget to update MANIFEST, if files are added, moved, or deleted.
This isn't meant to addr
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:47:14AM -0600, Paul Seamons wrote:
: > =item *
: >
: > Quantifiers (except C and C) cause a matched subrule or subpattern to
: > return an array of C objects, instead of just a single object.
:
: What is the effect of the quantifiers C<**{0,1}> and C<**{0,1}?> ?
That wo
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:47:14AM -0600, Paul Seamons wrote:
> > =item *
> >
> > Quantifiers (except C and C) cause a matched subrule or subpattern to
> > return an array of C objects, instead of just a single object.
>
> What is the effect of the quantifiers C<**{0,1}> and C<**{0,1}?> ? Will th
Bob Rogers wrote:
The following patch makes Parrot_get_name report a different error
message if Parrot_MMD_search_default_func finds nothing, to distinguish
this from the case where nothing is found. I am finding this helpful in
debugging.
But this seems like a band-aid, for two reasons:
> =item *
>
> Quantifiers (except C and C) cause a matched subrule or subpattern to
> return an array of C objects, instead of just a single object.
What is the effect of the quantifiers C<**{0,1}> and C<**{0,1}?> ? Will they
behave like ? and ?? and return a single object - or will they cause t
Here's some more commentary to draft zero of the capturing semantics
(thanks, Damian!), based partially on PGE's current implementation.
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 10:51:53PM +1000, Damian Conway wrote:
> [...]
> =head2 Nested subpattern captures
> [...]
> There may also be shortcuts for accessing ne
What's really odd is that document links to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_disjunction which ends up
stating that chained xors are associative and commutative, meaning
that instead of acting as one(), it counts parity.
Rob
On 5/9/05, David Landgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Wo
Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
If you are embedding or extending Parrot and linked against libparrot
you now have to additionally link with one of:
src/null_config.o
src/parrot_config.o # prefix := build-dir
src/install_config.o # prefix := --prefix dir
leo
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
"Juerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You both use "iff". What does that mean?
I believe it's to be read "if and only if".
Yes, but that doesn't explain what it means. Rather than me try to
explain it (poorly)...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if
David
Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
3) "make install" creates src/parrot_config_install.c and links that
into parrot_install$EXE, which during installation becomes
.../bin/parrot$EXE. With this step we get rid of the problem with
runtime vs build directory library usage.
Done (rev 8028), with slight
Autrijus wrote:
/me eagerly awaits new revelation from Damian...
Be careful what you wish for. Here's draft zero. ;-)
Note that there may still be bugs in the examples, or even in the design.
@Larry has thrashed this through pretty carefully, and Patrick has implemented
it for PGE, but it's 10.30
"Andy Lester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:43:53AM -0400, Robert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>> > Go look at Module::Starter.
>>
>> Seems it is not available as a PPM for ActiveStates Perl distro.
>
> Please don't let that be an impedim
Jonathan Scott Duff wrote:
Is there some reason that runtime/parrot/library isn't in the list of
search paths for both include_paths and dynext_paths?
Fixed.
load_bytecode "PGE.pbc"# should work now
i.e. load_bytecode searches now:
- runtime/parrot/library/
- runtime/parrot/
- ./
curren
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:15:30PM +0100, Carl Franks wrote:
> Are you subscribed to perl6-compiler?
Yes, of course I am. :-)
> Yesterday Patrick Michaud posted "PGE features update (corrections)"
> which describes the results you've got:
Ahh. I must've missed it. Thanks for the pointer.
/me
I will be releasing a full description of the new capturing semantics in the
next day or two. It will be appended to the appropriate Synopsis, but I'll
also post it here. It may be as soon as tomorrow, but I'm away teaching this
week, so my time is restricted.
Damian
Are you subscribed to perl6-compiler?
Yesterday Patrick Michaud posted "PGE features update (corrections)"
which describes the results you've got:
* Match objects for nested captures are nested into the surrounding
capture object. Thus, given
rulesub = p6rule(":w (let) ( (\w+) \:= (\S+) )"
As Pugs now has Rule support via PGE (either with external parrot or a
faster, linked libparrot), I've been playing with the new capturing
semantics.
Currently, matching "123" against /(.(.(.)))/ produces this:
$0: 123
$1: 123
$1[0]: 23
$1[0][0]: 3
Instead of the Perl 5 behaviou
Leopold Toetsch (via RT) wrote:
1) We have F, which is a frozen
image of the config hash generated by F. Creating the
frozen image needs already parrot (a possibly already existing parrot or
miniparrot in the long run). But locating this file needs the library or
include path, with resides in t
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:45:08PM +0200, Jens Rieks wrote:
Hi,
C is now implemented. The second part (find_(not_)cclass) will
follow tomorrow.
Wow, that's fast
The attached patch file adjusts C to always return false
for offsets beyond the end of the string, and updates
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:45:08PM +0200, Jens Rieks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> C is now implemented. The second part (find_(not_)cclass) will
> follow tomorrow.
The attached patch file adjusts C to always return false
for offsets beyond the end of the string, and updates
t/op/string_cclass.t to test th
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 07:24:49AM +0800, Autrijus Tang wrote:
> Greetings. Attached is a patch that I'm currently using in Pugs's
> bundled PGE.pbc, in order to make PGE output properly escaped strings,
> in a format ready to be used form Haskell FFI.
>
> I'd appreciate comments, and if it's oka
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 11:45:08PM +0200, Jens Rieks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> C is now implemented. The second part (find_(not_)cclass) will
> follow tomorrow.
Wow, yippee -- that is fast! There were several times yesterday
when I really wished for find_not_cclass, so this will really
clean up (and spe
51 matches
Mail list logo
