Vladimir Lipsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
class_count_mutex is used without having been initialized. The fixes that.
Thanks, applied - r8198
leo
Hello,
I'm having a seriously good time porting Maypole to Perl 6. If you
still have reservations about how Perl 6 is going to be to program in,
I urge you to try programming in it.
Now, commercial over, I have some questions.
What's the syntax for declaring inherited anonymous
You'd probably need to pull a later version from hs-plugin's darcs
repository:
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/code/hs-plugins
ok, thank for advice, now I'm in process of installing this.
However even with elder hs-plugins parrot and perl support was installed
fine; (looks like I only
# New Ticket Created by Curtis Rawls
# Please include the string: [perl #36026]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36026
The first patch (optimizer.patch) does
cleanup/refactoring/improvements to the
Hi,
the attached patch shows a problem with chomp.
Output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projekte/pugs$ ./pugs -Iblib6/lib
t/builtins/strings/chomp.t
1..12
ok 1 - our variable is chomped correctly
ok 2 - our variable is chomped again with no effect
ok 3 - our variable is chomped correctly
ok 4 - our
Hi,
Simon Cozens wrote:
I'm having a seriously good time porting Maypole to Perl 6. If you
still have reservations about how Perl 6 is going to be to program in,
I urge you to try programming in it.
Now, commercial over, I have some questions.
:)
class Foo {
has Class
Hi,
Yuval Kogman wrote:
We have a pretty complex declarative language for argument
processing in the parameter declaration:
[...]
arity as a number does not give enough reflection into these
properties.
Indeed.
Are signatures going to be an exposed first class object in Perl 6?
I hope so,
Hi,
while responding to nothingmuch++'s post function signatures?, I
thought that it'll be great if Code objects were fully introspectable.
I.e.:
foo.statements; # List of statements
foo.statements[0] # First statement
foo.statements[2] = ...;# Statement
Curtis Rawls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first patch (optimizer.patch) does
cleanup/refactoring/improvements to the strength_reduce() function in
optimizer.c .
Thanks, applied - 8203
NB: some more come to my mind:
add I0, 1 = inc I0
add N0, 1.0 = inc N0
sub I0, 1 = dec I0
sub
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Blechschmidt) writes:
I think the only thing you're missing are two braces:
$.request_class = class is Foo::Request {};
Thank you; then how do I put methods into $.request_class?
--
I will make no bargains with terrorist hardware.
-- Peter da Silva
Hi,
Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Blechschmidt) writes:
I think the only thing you're missing are two braces:
$.request_class = class is Foo::Request {};
Thank you; then how do I put methods into $.request_class?
$.request_class = class is Foo::Request {
method blarb
Tcl has a need to be able to convert between Lists and Strings. All of the
morphing samples that are in, say, PerlUndef are for scalars.
Right now, I have a PIR method, _Tcl::__stringToList that takes a string,
and then uses the tcl parser to split it up into a list.
What I'd like to do is
The problem is that if you do
loadlib /home/rogers/foo/bar/baz
Parrot_load_lib finds and loads /home/rogers/foo/bar/baz.so just fine,
but then the library isn't initialized properly because it attempts to
look up the address of Parrot_lib_/home/rogers/foo/bar/baz_load via
dlsym, and
On May 26, Patrick R. Michaud said:
commit N backtracking fails completely
cut N remove what matched up to this point from the
string
after P N we must be after the pattern P
!after PN we must NOT be after the pattern P
before P
This patch prevents from an attempt to add a NULL PMC_EXT structure to the
pmc ext pool while in dod sweep run.
dod.c.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:08:58PM -0400, vadim wrote:
While 'pugs' binary is a bit larger than 7Mb, 'pugs' with support of
parrot and perl is only a bit smaller than 20M. Am I understanding
correctly that both Perl and Parrot get statically built into binary?
That is correct.
Thanks,
As soon as I have finished with PXPerl 5.8.6-2 (with Pugs 6.2.5 and
Parrot 0.2.0), I'll try to handle this =)
On 5/28/05, Autrijus Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:24:13PM +0200, Gr?oire P?n wrote:
make install with Pugs creates a pugs.exe.bat file in Perl bin
While 'pugs' binary is a bit larger than 7Mb, 'pugs' with support of
parrot and perl is only a bit smaller than 20M. Am I understanding
correctly that both Perl and Parrot get statically built into binary?
That is correct.
thanks!
BTW it is quite convenient to have an independent binary
On 5/29/05, Ingo Blechschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
while responding to nothingmuch++'s post function signatures?, I
thought that it'll be great if Code objects were fully introspectable.
I.e.:
foo.statements; # List of statements
foo.statements[0] #
Nested packfile segments of type directory are freed twice by
default_destroy(). The first time it happens in directory_destroy(), and the
second time in PackFile_Segment_destroy(). This behavior is, of course,
incorrect, the patch fixes it.
packfile.c.patch
Description: Binary data
Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
Are signatures going to be an exposed first class object in Perl 6?
I hope so, too.
~foo.signature;
# Signature objects should stringify to a canonized form, e.g.:
# ~sub (Str $bar, CoolClass $z where {...}) {...}.signature ==
# 'Str $bar, ANONCLASS(0xDEADBEEF)'
21 matches
Mail list logo
