On 8/10/06, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it's a design smell. The point of core is to huffman code common
things, so something in core with _ should normally either be shorter
or out of the core.
I don't think I agree. I've been programming in Ruby, and I
appreciate all the nice
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:25:24PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
At 12:35 AM -0400 8/11/06, Stevan Little wrote:
Quick question for the group.
Can there be more than one authority?
module Foo-0.0.1-cpan:JRANDOM-http://www.foo.org-mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
S11 would seem to indicate no (it
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some object types can behave as value types. Every object can produce
a safe key identifier (CSKID for short) that uniquely identifies the
-object for hashing and other value-base comparisons. Normal objects
+object for hashing and other
/LURK
On 11 Aug 2006, at 06:11, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
This is a bad joke, right? How much of your life are you intending to
spend on chasing down hard to find missing braces bugs?
On 11 Aug 2006, at 06:52, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Seriously: I am serious. Many of the changes I have in mind
On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+To return from other types of code structures, the Cleave function
+is used. The first argument, if supplied, specifies a CSelector
+for the control structure to leave. The CSelector and will be
+smart-matched against the dynamic scope
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:46:37AM +0100, Sam Phillips wrote:
Six years into the project the Parrot team, responsible for the
Perl6 internals finaly get round to arguing about what style of C
brackets and indenting they are going to use..
It's not an argument.[*] If people kept talking
Hi
Today in #parrot a question was done:
rule foo { bar* }
should be considered:
rule foo { ?wsbar*?ws }
or
rule foo { ?ws(bar?ws)* }
?
Cheers
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga -
在 2006/8/11 下午 2:35 時，Luke Palmer 寫到：
I think that standard functions ought not to have underscores *most of
the time*, because their presence indicates something that could be
better named or is miscategorized. However, for methods, especially
advanced or introspective methods, I think longer
Author: larry
Date: Fri Aug 11 08:41:18 2006
New Revision: 10828
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
2nd whack, with help from gaal++, luqui++, audreyt++, malaire++, and others++.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:28:08PM +0800, Audrey Tang wrote:
: For other built-in types, I think underscore names are just fine. For example,
: metaclass methods such as Class.has_method should indeed remain as such. :)
That's fine--I don't think of anything behind the META curtain as core,
at
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 04:43:55PM +0100, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
Today in #parrot a question was done:
rule foo { bar* }
should be considered:
rule foo { ?wsbar*?ws }
or
rule foo { ?ws(bar?ws)* }
In the past we've always gone with the former.
If bar is also a rule,
On 8/10/06, Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More on the STM branch:
ANSWERS, FOR A CHANGE
* A comment asks:
/* XXX is it okay to combine flatten/slurpy into one flag? */
The answer is No: flat is an output flag, slurpy_array is an input
flag, and there's no guarantee
On 8/10/06, Chip Salzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate the quality of the stm code in general. You're being careful,
you know what you're doing with C, and you're good at creating abstractions.
I hope when STM is done[*] you'll keep hacking on Parrot.
[*] As if it will ever be
Author: audreyt
Date: Fri Aug 11 20:28:03 2006
New Revision: 10855
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
* S06: dconway++ suggested that we still provide convenience methods
on Signature level, to reduce line noise in common want operations.
* Also remove a stray paragraph
recently, perl 6 development has taken the form of a multi-method
dispatch. that is, multiple implementations are under active
development. this includes pugs (in haskell,) v6 (in perl5,)
v6-Compiler (in perl6,) and perl6 (on parrot.) hopefully, each of
these returns the same result, a
Note: This reply is being sent to all 4 mailing lists that the
original was, though I am only subscribed to the first 2 myself, for
the benefit of completeness to the readers of the original.
--
As my initial reply, I'll bring up 2 recent discussions or Pugs
changes that
Just to avoid repeating some of the discussion, here's a link to #perl6:
http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2006-08-07,Monsel=110#l193
The discussion goes on and off for most of the rest of the page,
so you probably want to search for and highlight todo if you're
using
On 8/11/06, Larry Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to avoid repeating some of the discussion, here's a link to #perl6:
http://colabti.de/irclogger/irclogger_log/perl6?date=2006-08-07,Monsel=110#l193
The discussion goes on and off for most of the rest of the page,
so you probably want to
18 matches
Mail list logo
