# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #49177]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49177
PAST::Val nodes should throw an exception if :value attribute is not
set.
Pm
At present this isn't possible, the best we can offer is
/path/to/parrot/parrot /path/to/parrot/languages/perl6/perl6.pbc hello.pl,
which is a pain. So, we need a way to package this up into a simple
shell script, executable, or other item that can be placed in a
PATH and executed directly.
Author: pmichaud
Date: Fri Dec 28 14:58:53 2007
New Revision: 24256
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd15_objects.pod
Log:
[pdds]: 0..10 makes eleven internal attributes. (bgeron++)
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd15_objects.pod
Author: larry
Date: Fri Dec 28 14:54:36 2007
New Revision: 14474
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S05.pod
Log:
Fossil noticed by pmichaud++
Quote macros should be quote: rather than circumfix:--the latter implies
EXPR in the middle.
Modified:
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #49170]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49170
Many have indicated that the plethora of tools (PCT, PAST, NQP)
seem like a
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #49171]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49171
This is a metaticket identifying the other bugs or TODO items
in RT (both the
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 08:09:23PM -0600, John M. Dlugosz wrote:
At present this isn't possible, the best we can offer is
/path/to/parrot/parrot /path/to/parrot/languages/perl6/perl6.pbc
hello.pl, which is a pain. So, we need a way to package this up into a
simple shell script,
On Friday 28 December 2007 16:16:55 Patrick R.Michaud wrote:
Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
throws a cryptic exception message like:
Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::Grammar'
A better exception message would be something like:
Hereby I declare myself as the Pharao of the Perl 6 Documentation.
My first sign of regence will be most probably tomorrow the release the
initial stable release of
http://search.cpan.org/~lichtkind/Perl6-Doc/
this is a perly command line tool to read perl 6 related documentation.
The code
Please see the refactored version of config/auto/perldoc.pm and two test
files, t/configure/147-auto_perldoc-01.t and -02.t, which were committed
in or before r24258.
I had intended to submit these as a patch to list, but my SVN sandbox
got confused today during theh planned outage, and everthing
The recent perl6 brouhaha got me to try out pugs again.
After grabbing pugs from svn and running the smoke tests
(http://xrl.us/bdipe), I noticed some ext/File-Util/t/03.dirs.t was
failing and looked like it would be a relatively easy fix.
Diff attached.
I worked from the File::Util docs on
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:01:22PM -0800, Stephen Weeks wrote:
Working on getting parrot to parse the lojban grammar, I found that it
would hang forever with --target=parse. Tracked it down to a ws rule.
When I define a custom token ws in the grammar, it parses without
problem.
Built a
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 05:12:24PM -0800, Christopher Pruden wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Christopher Pruden
# Please include the string: [perl #49085]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49085
On second look, it appears that PGE is doing the correct thing, and the
problem we were seeing that triggered this ticket was due to a GC bug.
So, never mind!
Thanks,
Pm
On Friday 28 December 2007 17:04:40 herbert breunung wrote:
I have also plans to add my perl article (once they transelated) for $foo
perl magazine and maybe some perl.com articles, if chomatic allowes.
It's fine with O'Reilly, as long as the authors of the articles agree (they
hold the
Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
Currently the most frequently asked question (by far) about perl6
is how can I just get an executable that I can use to run Perl
6 programs?
At present this isn't possible, the best we can offer is
/path/to/parrot/parrot
Will Coleda wrote:
Yes, it would be specified as Int/Str/Num in the signature. But
then invoking the multi with an I register or integer constant
should recognize 'Int' as being a match, and not just 'Integer'.
My concern here is HLL interop. I think it would be cleaner to specify
the base
Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
throws a cryptic exception message like:
Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::Grammar'
A better exception message would be something like:
Perl6::Grammar (2) child of PAST::Op
Bob Rogers wrote:
The attached patch adds decoding of call/return registers to the
disassembler, and also fixes a segfault; both are byproducts of a long
and otherwise fruitless debugging session. Please let me know what you
think.
Looks good. Go ahead and commit. Better abstraction for
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #49173]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49173
Currently all of the builtins for perl6 are written in PIR.
However, it would
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
Earlier I read over this, thinking: there's probably a good reason for that
(the need for being contiguous), but I haven't figured it out yet.
For sake of documentation, could you please explain why this is so?
so, why would it not be possible to write this:
sub foo
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #49182]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49182
I'm converting a parrot-porters post into RT tickets so
that progress can be
thanks to chromatic, so i have ask Jonathan Scott Duff, Phil Crow and
wait for /Adrianos answer.
what i yesterday also forgot to mention is that rumor says that the
emerald tables
are designed to can provide answer for people on over 100 different
levels of consciousness.
to teach the
Hi
Probably this is all known, but as I am quite out from Parrot lately,
and just wanted to try a make test under Perl 6, today I compiled
Parrot, and run a make test.
This was the result:
Test Summary Report
---
t/configure/115-auto_warnings-01.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4
.cgi? Is that really a CGI-based implementation? Because that seems
a little, I don't know, backward-looking. Maybe it's just me, but it
seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl
is for CGI scripts, and real web apps need to be written in
something else (be it Java,
On Dec 29, 2007 4:56 PM, Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.cgi? Is that really a CGI-based implementation? Because that seems
a little, I don't know, backward-looking. Maybe it's just me, but it
seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl
is for CGI scripts,
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 28 December 2007 07:09:24 Andy Lester wrote:
Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions? Seems
to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
I can't think of any reason they could be negative. Can you make a patch to
convert them and
What about when you want to implement things like, element -1 gets
the last element of the array? That's the case in some languages, I
believe...
Yes, but we're talking about returning the number of elements in a
PMC. That should never be negative.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: allison
Date: Sat Dec 29 09:14:50 2007
New Revision: 24265
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd25_concurrency.pod
Log:
[pdd] Completing truncated sentence in Concurrency PDD.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd25_concurrency.pod
Please review the patch attached, which proposes adding a new Parrot
configuration step, auto::fink, for the purpose of locating the Fink
directories needed for three later configuration steps.
Adding config/auto/fink.pm and 9 test files. Modifying
Parrot::Configure::Step::List, the 3 affected
Andy Lester wrote:
What about when you want to implement things like, element -1 gets the
last element of the array? That's the case in some languages, I
believe...
Yes, but we're talking about returning the number of elements in a PMC.
That should never be negative.
Unless someone
Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
Probably this is all known, but as I am quite out from Parrot lately,
and just wanted to try a make test under Perl 6, today I compiled
Parrot, and run a make test.
Which OS-cpu? Which Parrot version?
This was the result:
Test Summary Report
Hi
James E Keenan wrote:
Which OS-cpu? Which Parrot version?
Forgot to tell it.
Mac OS Tiger on PPC G4
Perl 5.10
Parrot Revision: 24263
t/library/mime_base64.t(Wstat: 6 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Can you send output of prove -v?
On Saturday 29 December 2007 01:29:46 Allison Randal wrote:
* convert perl6.pbc into a C executable
Possible, but ultimately too constraining. There are significant
advantages to having the full Parrot runtime environment available.
Don't reject this out of hand. The C executables
On Saturday 29 December 2007 06:56:45 Mark J. Reed wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but it
seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl
is for CGI scripts, and real web apps need to be written in
something else (be it Java, PHP, Ruby/Rails, whatever).
Proposed new rule: for
Ok, consider me duly chastised. Sorry for the sidetracking.
On 12/29/07, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 06:56:45 Mark J. Reed wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but it
seems like it will just feed the all-too-common perception that Perl
is for CGI scripts, and
On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:35:00 Mark J. Reed wrote:
Ok, consider me duly chastised. Sorry for the sidetracking.
It's not a *bad* idea, but it's less important in my mind than getting useful
information on the wiki. Anyone who wants to pursue it can do so, but I'd
like to forestall a
On Dec 29, 2007 11:34 AM, Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
Earlier I read over this, thinking: there's probably a good reason for
that
(the need for being contiguous), but I haven't figured it out yet.
For sake of documentation, could you please explain why
From: Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:08:10 +0200
Looks good. Go ahead and commit. Better abstraction for signature
decoding can be added later.
Allison
Thanks; done in r24268. I also changed it to use PIR syntax, so we
wouldn't have a new syntax to
Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
In order to solve that, adding a :invocant('any') (* a special marker would
be more convenient, maybe someone would like to define a class 'any' (you
never know :-) but that's beside the pointnow *)
By adding these markers, what effectively happens is that all :invocant
On Saturday 29 December 2007 13:47:49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ while (flags idx sizeof(buf)-100) {
Is 100 the length of everything in flag_names appended together?
-- c
chromatic wrote:
Don't reject this out of hand. The C executables generated from pbc2c link
against libparrot, so they have the full Parrot runtime environment
available. Basically, this code replaces src/main.c with src/perl6pbc.c and
a few lines that create a new Parrot interpreter and
c: Alberto Simões reported (new?) errors in
t/compilers/json/to_parrot.t on list today.
Mac OS Tiger on PPC G4
Perl 5.10
Parrot Revision: 24263
See attached.
Can you take a look? thanks.
kid51
to_parrot.err
Description: Binary data
Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi
James E Keenan wrote:
Which OS-cpu? Which Parrot version?
Forgot to tell it.
Mac OS Tiger on PPC G4
Perl 5.10
Parrot Revision: 24263
t/library/mime_base64.t(Wstat: 6 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
Can you
This thread originated on perl6.compiler (see either of the links below), but
it pertains to earlier discussions on perl6.users, so I'm continuing here.
http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.compiler/2007/12/msg1677.html
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 07:11:23PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
On Friday 28 December 2007 16:16:55 Patrick R.Michaud wrote:
Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
throws a cryptic exception message like:
Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::Grammar'
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:04:09PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
Whenever a PAST::Op node gets a non-PAST child, PCT currently
throws a cryptic exception message like:
Method 'named' not found for invocant of class 'Perl6::Grammar'
A better exception
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:29:46AM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
Patrick R.Michaud (via RT) wrote:
* add some smarts to Parrot to allow it to search/execute .pbc files
in some standard locations (RT#47992)
We certainly need to allow configurable search paths (at runtime and
compile-time).
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:13:19PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 29 December 2007 01:29:46 Allison Randal wrote:
* convert perl6.pbc into a C executable
Possible, but ultimately too constraining. There are significant
advantages to having the full Parrot runtime environment
On Sat Dec 29 11:37:49 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Smoke test results have been favorable, so I will now proceed to
renaming gen::cpu to auto::cpu, the better to reflect its character as
probe.
I moved these files. All configuration tests are passing.
However, I'm having problems with 3
On Sat Dec 29 15:57:14 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I'm having problems with 3 of the coding standards tests on
these 2 files:
config/auto/cpu/i386/memcpy_mmx.c
config/auto/cpu/i386/memcpy_sse.c
They're causing failures in:
t/codingstd/c_indent.t
t/codingstd/copyright.t
As of r24274:
$ perl Configure.pl
$ make pbc_to_c.pir
$ cd languages/perl6
$ make
$ ../../parrot pbc_to_c.pir perl6.pbc
$ cd ../..
$ languages/perl6/perl6 languages/perl6/t/01-sanity/01-tap.t
1..10
ok 1
ok 2
On Saturday 29 December 2007 18:13:26 chromatic wrote:
As of r24274:
Let's call that r24276.
$ perl Configure.pl
$ make pbc_to_c.pir
... and this should be:
$ make pbc_to_c
$ cd languages/perl6
$ make
$ ../../parrot pbc_to_c.pir perl6.pbc
... and
I'm closing this ticket for a number of reasons.
1. The subroutine redefined problem -- the original focus of the RT
-- is, I think, largely a Devel::Cover problem. More of an annoyance
than anything else.
2. The other problem I discussed -- the spurious test failures while
running
# New Ticket Created by Flavio Poletti
# Please include the string: [perl #49202]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49202
Hi,
I encountered a couple of problems with lib/SmartLinks.pm. In
particular,
You have my permission as well.
-Scott
On Dec 29, 2007 7:04 AM, herbert breunung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks to chromatic, so i have ask Jonathan Scott Duff, Phil Crow and
wait for /Adrianos answer.
what i yesterday also forgot to mention is that rumor says that the
emerald tables
Implemented chromatic's suggestion in r24283: using
Test::Harness::runtests() instead of prove.
explicitconf branch merged into trunk in r24294.
Hello list,
i don't know the actually state in the discussion about multiline
comments, but i would propose an idea.. a combination of POD's = and the
traditional route char...
=#
this is a multi
line comment
#=
=# comment #= this is not commented
What you think about it?
regards
Christian
59 matches
Mail list logo
